Cardiothoracic CTA in Infants Referred for Aortic Arch Evaluation—Retrospective Comparison of Iomeprol 350, Ioversol 350, Iopromide 370 and Iodixanol 320

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) in infants is considered one of the most challenging radiological examinations due to difficulties in balancing start delay, contrast agent (CA) volume and flow in order to achieve optimal opacification of the large vessels. This study aimed to compare the contrast enhancement achieved by four CAs when taking into consideration CA injection parameters and patient characteristics. Methods: We performed a retrospective assessment of forty-eight consecutive cardiothoracic CTAs performed for aortic arch evaluation on children aged 0–1 year. All examinations were performed using the same 64-slice scanner and power injector using the bolus tracking technique. Axial 0.6 mm slices were used to measure large vessel enhancement using regions of interest at the level of the main pulmonary artery, ascending and descending aorta. The recorded variables included anthropometric measurements, CA type, flow rate, volume, and the average Hounsfield unit (HU) values of the blood pool. Descriptive statistics are presented as averages and standard deviations (SD) for normal distributed data or otherwise as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Results: We found no statistically significant differences between age and anthropometric parameters when looking at different CAs. The median CA volume was 7 (IQR, 7–9) mL with the average flow rate of 0.94 (SD, 0.23) mL/s. Ascending aorta average HU values were 605.9 (SD, 177.23) for Iomeprol 350, 626 (SD, 183.83) for Ioversol 350, 530.83 (SD, 175.56) for Iopromide 370 and 354.91 (SD, 115.81) for Iodixanol 320. The difference in HU value for Iodixanol 320 compared to the other CAs was statistically significant. Similar differences were found for the other vascular structures. Conclusion: In CTA of infants suspected of aortic arch hypoplasia/coarctation, Iodixanol 320 provided up to 40% less enhancement of the great vessels when compared to Iomeprol 350, Ioversol 350 and Iopromide 370.

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of ECG Gated versus Non-Gated CT Angiography in Ascending Aortic Dissection: A GRRAS Study

“…Different contrast agents may provide various levels of opacification [ 28 ], and, using a protocol targeted on the estimated body mass index [ 29 ], in our study, the images were acquired using the same contrast agent and the same protocol; therefore, they should provide similar enhancement and no differences in terms of dissection flap identification.…”

Detection of Coronary Artery and Aortic Arch Anomalies in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot Using CT Angiography

“…Technical limitations were also present. Not only was it possible that different contrast agents might have impacted the quality of the CT examination [ 40 ], but the results of this study were obtained using a 64-slice last-generation CT scanner. In order to reduce the number of misinterpreted cases, higher temporal resolution CCTA is needed.…”

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Heart Disease in Children

“…In the third paper, Dr. Pop from the University of Medicine Pharmacy Sciences and Technology of Tirgu Mures and the Tirgu Mures Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases and Heart Transplant, Tirgu Mures, Romania, compares different contrast agents (Iomeprol 350, Ioversol 350, Iopromide 370, and Iodixanol 320) used for computed tomographic angiography (CTA) studies in infants referred for aortic arch evaluation [ 4 ]. Dr.…”