2018
DOI: 10.20960/nh.1279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiorespiratory fitness and fat oxidation during exercise as protective factors for insulin resistance in sedentary women with overweight or obesity

Abstract: VO2(%) and MFO are independent protective factors for IR. No association was found between FATmax and IR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement, Cancino‐Ramírez et al (2018) showed that VO 2 max and MFO are protective factors for insulin resistance and, therefore, CMR in sedentary women with overweight or obesity. However, VO 2 max was more strongly associated with CMR, suggesting that VO 2 max is a better predictor compared to MFO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement, Cancino‐Ramírez et al (2018) showed that VO 2 max and MFO are protective factors for insulin resistance and, therefore, CMR in sedentary women with overweight or obesity. However, VO 2 max was more strongly associated with CMR, suggesting that VO 2 max is a better predictor compared to MFO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…range between 33% and 65% of VO 2 max) and the test ends when subject reaches a Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER) = 1.0 (Achten et al, 2002). Moreover, MFO has shown to be related to some individual CMR factors such as insulin resistance, obesity, plasma triglycerides and body weight (Cancino‐Ramírez et al, 2018; Kelley, Goodpaster, Wing, & Simoneau, 2017; Robinson, Hattersley, Frost, Chambers, & Wallis, 2015; Rosenkilde, Nordby, Nielsen, Stallknecht, & Helge, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the incremental treadmill test, the MFO of the IR group was significantly smaller than that of the no-IR group, which is consistent with previous studies (Cancino Ramírez et al, 2018); under the same exercise intensity, both the AFO and RFO of the IR group were lower than those of the no-IR group, and the difference increased in significance with the exercise intensity. This phenomenon may be related to the mitochondrial dysfunction in the adipose tissue of the IR group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Different Metflex markers have been physiologically related to physical fitness and insulin sensitivity [ 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 24 ]. The present study aimed to determine their correlation particularly testing their association with body fatness while controlling for VO 2peak (mL∙kg −1 ∙min −1 ) in subjects with obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%