1961
DOI: 10.1172/jci104402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiorespiratory Effects of Experimental Lung Embolism*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, no increase in peak inspiratory pressure, reflecting dynamic lung compliance, was observed. In previous studies, the fall in lung compliance has been the most obvious change in lung mechanics, following pulmonary micro-embolism (Halmagyi & Colebatch, 1961;Nadel et al 1964), but this was only seen in this study at the higher dose of BaSO4 particles.…”
Section: Effects Of Microvascular Occlusioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, no increase in peak inspiratory pressure, reflecting dynamic lung compliance, was observed. In previous studies, the fall in lung compliance has been the most obvious change in lung mechanics, following pulmonary micro-embolism (Halmagyi & Colebatch, 1961;Nadel et al 1964), but this was only seen in this study at the higher dose of BaSO4 particles.…”
Section: Effects Of Microvascular Occlusioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In this study, the bronchoconstriction, which followed the injection of collagen fibrils, was reduced by 60 % after section of the vagus nerves. On the other hand, other studies suggest that vagal connexions do not contribute to the genesis of airway constriction in response to BaSO4-induced pulmonary micro-embolism (Halmagyi & Colebatch, 1961;Nadel etal. 1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,32 Smaller emboli (microemboli of Ͻ200 m) initiate pulmonary vasoconstriction, resulting in a considerable increase in pulmonary arterial pressure, even if less than 50% of the pulmonary arterial vasculature is blocked. 27,33 In the present study, the slight increase in pulmonary arterial pressure may have been a result of redistribution of blood flow after macroembolism, blocking less than 50% of the pulmonary arterial vasculature. Differences between the animal model and the clinical situation pertain to the limitations of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The increase in pulmonary arterial pressure may have been caused by pulmonary vasoconstriction elicited by vasoactive mediators released from the bone marrow cavity or as a result of lung injury after embolization 38,39 . Alternatively, a reflex response to embolization may have elicited pulmonary vasoconstriction 40,41 . Methylmethacrylate has also been reported to cause pulmonary vasoconstriction 42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%