2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiopulmonary bypass as a bridge for bronchial foreign body removal in a child with pulmonary artery sling

Abstract: Rationale:Successful removal of an airway foreign body (FB) in some intractable cases can be very challenging, because of tracheal anomalies, unstable respiratory status of the patients, and the location of FB. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) support for the treatment of a FB is extremely rare.Patient concerns:We present a case of a 39-month-old previously healthy girl who was admitted to our hospital for suspected FB aspiration (FBA). Initially, the attempt for removal of the FB by conventional bronch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, cardiopulmonary bypass, which is more widely available than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, could be and has been used for foreign body removal. 3 In some reported instances, 4 an open operation with a cardiopulmonary bypass was indicated because there was a vascular sling tracheal obstruction as well as a foreign body. However, cardiopulmonary bypass requires arterial cannulation with attendant risks, and full heparinisation risks haemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, cardiopulmonary bypass, which is more widely available than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, could be and has been used for foreign body removal. 3 In some reported instances, 4 an open operation with a cardiopulmonary bypass was indicated because there was a vascular sling tracheal obstruction as well as a foreign body. However, cardiopulmonary bypass requires arterial cannulation with attendant risks, and full heparinisation risks haemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%