“…Regarding the target chamber for the CNA technique, the research groups of Dr. Pachon et al [ 9 , 18 ] and Dr. Aksu et al [ 16 , 17 ] ablated all of the atrial GP groups in both atria, while Dr. Yao et al [ 12 , 19 , 20 ] mainly focused on the GP groups in the left atrium and Dr. Debruyne et al [ 21 , 22 ] only ablated the GP groups in the right atrium. Additionally, the endpoint of the CNA procedure is also quite varied among published studies, including the disappearance of vagal responses that are evoked by extracardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) [ 23 ]; the disappearance of vagal responses evoked by intracardiac HFS or radiofrequency (RF) application [ 12 , 24 ]; the elimination of intracardiac electrograms in targeted GP regions [ 9 , 13 , 16 , 17 ]; the elimination of atropine responses [ 25 ]; and improvements in the bradyarrhythmia or electrophysiological parameters [ 16 , 17 ]. In other words, a series of urgent questions related to the technical details of the CNA procedure have not been clearly illustrated, such as how to identify optimal candidates and GPs locations; what are the different impacts of sequential GP ablation on the vagal control of the sinoatrial node (SAN) and atrioventricular node (AVN); what are the ablation strategies for patients with different indications; what is the optimal endpoint of the CNA procedure; and what are the long-term outcomes of the CNA technique.…”