“…To explain this, it could be said that 5‐aza‐dC is more effective in MSC S differentiation into other cell types (Fukuda, ; Makino et al, ; Wakitani et al, ; Xu et al, ). It seems that in application of 5‐aza‐dC more time is needed to get an acceptable response (Taranger et al, ), and the better results may be obtained by using hyper‐acetylating agents in combination with 5‐aza‐dC (Talaei‐Khozani et al, ; Talaei‐Khozani et al, ; Vojdani et al, ); furthermore, 5‐aza‐dC would be more effective on ESCs markers expression, such as OCT4, SOX2 and Nanog (Hattori et al, ; Talaei‐Khozani et al, ; Tsuji‐Takayama et al, ), and its usage in most of the studies was on cell lines, unlike our study which was on primary cell cultures (Diepeveen et al, ; Håkelien et al, ). Additionally, 5‐aza‐dC at diverse doses exerts various effects on cell morphology and gene expression (Kumar et al, ; Zhou et al, ), and also epigenetic status is varied in dissimilar animal cells (Kang et al, ), and changed with time and with environmental stimulations (Jirtle and Skinner, ; Szyf, ).…”