Cardiologists’ perceptions on multidisciplinary collaboration in heart failure care - a qualitative study

Abstract

Background Cardiologists play a key role in multidisciplinary care by guiding heart failure (HF) management in the hospital and in the community. Regional implementation of multidisciplinary health care interventions depends on how they perceive collaboration with other health care disciplines, yet research on this topic is limited. This study aimed to explore the views and opinions of cardiologists on multidisciplinary collaboration in HF care. Methods We conducted a qualitative study based on face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 11 Belgian cardiologists between September 2019 and February 2020. We used the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) method as guidance for data analysis until data saturation was reached. Results Cardiologists consider the general practitioner (GP) and HF nurse as the most important partners in HF management. Cardiologists identified four problems in current multidisciplinary collaboration: the communication of a HF diagnosis to the patient, advanced care planning, titration of HF medication by the GP and electronic data exchange and communication. Three themes emerged as ideas for improvement of HF care: 1) expansion of the role of the HF nurse, 2) implementation of a structured, patient-centered, and flexible model of disease management program and 3) integrated data approaches. Conclusion Cardiologists value close cooperation with GPs in HF management. They advocate an expanded future role for the HF nurse, increased eHealth, and structured disease management to optimize current HF care.

Strategic Recommendations to Bridge the Gaps in Awareness, Diagnosis and Prevention of Heart Failure in the Middle East Region and Africa

“…The experts advocated the development of HF clinics and emphasised on the crucial role of nurses for driving optimal HF care. Similar thoughts were echoed by cardiologists’ who suggested implementation of a structured, patient-centered, and flexible model of disease management programme, along with integrated data approaches [ 64 ]. In comparison to general cardiology out-patient department, dedicated HF clinics were better in maintaining guideline-directed medication therapy, together with decreased rate of rehospitalisation and mortality [ 65 , 66 ].…”

Navigating the Complexity: A Comprehensive Review of Managing Pregnancy in Complete Heart Block Cases

“…Collaboration with obstetricians is fundamental in determining the optimal mode and timing of delivery, considering both cardiac considerations and obstetric factors. The cardiologist's specialized knowledge ensures a comprehensive approach to managing the cardiovascular aspects of pregnancies affected by CHB [ 27 ].…”

Exploring pathways to optimise care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): Protocol for a three-phase critical realist approach to theory-led intervention development for shared decision-making

“…SDM in practice is more complex, involving the communication of possible treatment options and the potential outcomes, probabilities and uncertainties by the clinician, and the processing of this information by the patient–followed by the weighing of the benefits and harms of treatment against the patient’s values and social context [ 23 ]. However, multidisciplinary, collaborative care is more complex than the dyadic communication typically characterised by SDM, making it necessary to consider roles and relationships (between practitioners, and between practitioners, patients and their families [ 24 ]) and how they influence decision-making.…”