Abstract:Objective:To examine cardio-respiratory effects of air pollution in rural older adults exercising outdoors.Methods:Adults 55 and over completed measurements of blood pressure, peak expiratory flow and oximetry daily, and of heart rate variability, endothelial function, spirometry, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and urinary oxidative stress markers weekly, before and after outdoor exercise, for 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effect models.Results:Pooled estimates combining 2013 (n = 36 partic… Show more
“…studies of summer and winter outdoor physical activity in older adults conducted in a predominantly rural area and small northern industrial city, respectively (Stieb et al 2017(Stieb et al , 2018. These findings provided evidence supporting the utility of the AQHI in predicting health risks for diverse health outcomes and types of communities not accounted for in developing the AQHI, which was based on the effects of air pollution on mortality in large urban centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We accounted for effects of time (trend and temporal cycles) using a linear function of time and day of week variables. In a previous study, we found no consistent associations with subdaily air pollution exposures in the hours prior to health measures (Stieb et al 2017), thus only daily 3-h maximum exposures (daily maximum of 3-h trailing averages) were considered. Air pollution variables were entered into models at individual lags of 0-2 days, each with natural spline functions of temperature with 3 degrees of freedom at individual lags of 0-2 days (9 models per pollutant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Methods were described in detail in our previous papers reporting findings from our summer and winter panel studies (Stieb et al 2017(Stieb et al , 2018. They are summarized briefly here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For weekly measures, pre-exercise measures were carried out up to 1.5 h before and 2 h after exercise. Details of instrumentation and measurement protocols are described elsewhere (Stieb et al 2017). We asked participants to engage in daily light exercise (e.g.…”
We examined whether exercising indoors vs. outdoors reduced the cardiorespiratory effects of outdoor air pollution. Adults ≥55 were randomly assigned to exercise indoors when the Air Quality Health Index was ≥5 and outdoors on other days (intervention group, n = 37), or outdoors everyday (control group, n = 35). Both groups completed cardiorespiratory measurements before and after exercise for up to 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effect regression models. In the control group, an interquartile range increase in fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) was associated with increases of 1.4% in heart rate (standard error (SE) = 0.7%) and 5.6% (SE = 2.6%) in malondialdehyde, and decreases of 5.6% (SE = 2.5%) to 16.5% (SE = 7.5%) in heart rate variability measures. While the hypothesized benefit of indoor vs. outdoor exercise could not be demonstrated due to an insufficient number of intervention days (n = 2), the study provides evidence of short-term effects of air pollution in older adults. ISRCTN #26552763.
“…studies of summer and winter outdoor physical activity in older adults conducted in a predominantly rural area and small northern industrial city, respectively (Stieb et al 2017(Stieb et al , 2018. These findings provided evidence supporting the utility of the AQHI in predicting health risks for diverse health outcomes and types of communities not accounted for in developing the AQHI, which was based on the effects of air pollution on mortality in large urban centres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We accounted for effects of time (trend and temporal cycles) using a linear function of time and day of week variables. In a previous study, we found no consistent associations with subdaily air pollution exposures in the hours prior to health measures (Stieb et al 2017), thus only daily 3-h maximum exposures (daily maximum of 3-h trailing averages) were considered. Air pollution variables were entered into models at individual lags of 0-2 days, each with natural spline functions of temperature with 3 degrees of freedom at individual lags of 0-2 days (9 models per pollutant).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Methods were described in detail in our previous papers reporting findings from our summer and winter panel studies (Stieb et al 2017(Stieb et al , 2018. They are summarized briefly here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For weekly measures, pre-exercise measures were carried out up to 1.5 h before and 2 h after exercise. Details of instrumentation and measurement protocols are described elsewhere (Stieb et al 2017). We asked participants to engage in daily light exercise (e.g.…”
We examined whether exercising indoors vs. outdoors reduced the cardiorespiratory effects of outdoor air pollution. Adults ≥55 were randomly assigned to exercise indoors when the Air Quality Health Index was ≥5 and outdoors on other days (intervention group, n = 37), or outdoors everyday (control group, n = 35). Both groups completed cardiorespiratory measurements before and after exercise for up to 10 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effect regression models. In the control group, an interquartile range increase in fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) was associated with increases of 1.4% in heart rate (standard error (SE) = 0.7%) and 5.6% (SE = 2.6%) in malondialdehyde, and decreases of 5.6% (SE = 2.5%) to 16.5% (SE = 7.5%) in heart rate variability measures. While the hypothesized benefit of indoor vs. outdoor exercise could not be demonstrated due to an insufficient number of intervention days (n = 2), the study provides evidence of short-term effects of air pollution in older adults. ISRCTN #26552763.
“…The acute effects of air pollutants have been demonstrated repeatedly in respiratory [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and cardiovascular patients [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Such panel studies have been performed in the elderly [22][23][24][25] and in areas with high air pollution [1,14,[26][27][28][29][30], but less so in young and healthy people in settings with moderate to low air pollution levels [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. We recruited healthy students from Vienna to study the physiological reactions of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems when exposed to everyday urban air pollution.…”
Twenty-four healthy students walked at least four times for 1 hour under each of the four settings: by a busy road; by a busy road wearing ear plugs; in a park; and in a park but exposed to traffic noise (65 dB) through speakers. Particle mass (smaller than 2.5 and 1 µm, PM1 and PM2.5, (respectively)particle number and noise levels were measured throughout each walk. Lung function and exhaled nitric oxide (NO) were measured before, immediately after, 1 hour after, and approximately 24 h after each walk. Blood pressure and heart-rate variability were measured every 15 min during each walk. Air pollution levels reduced lung function levels; noise levels reduced systolic blood pressure and heart-rate variability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.