2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Surveillance for Early Detection of Late Subclinical Cardiac Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors After Anthracycline Therapy

Abstract: BackgroundIn childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity is an important cause of morbidity and late mortality, but the optimal modality of cardiac surveillance still remains to be defined. The aim of this study was to assess whether non-invasive echocardiography-based functional cardiac measures can detect early subclinical myocardial changes in long-term pediatric cancer survivors who received anthracycline therapy.MethodsTwenty anthracycline-treated long-term CCSs and 20 age, sex,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The impairment of diastolic function is similar as described in the above mentioned study, 11 but the authors also reported lower systolic parameters in subgroups with lower doses of anthracycline therapy in comparison to anthracycline‐naïve subjects. This was not observed in our study, even though the median anthracycline dose in our cohort was higher (200 vs. 120 mg/m 2 ).A recent study by Sofia et al 15 compared 20 CCS and 20 controls and described no differences in biplane LVEF calculated by Simpson's rule and global longitudinal strain (GLS), but using RT‐3D echocardiography demonstrated a significant difference in LVEF.However, the mean values of both CCS and controls were in a normal range and no difference between diastolic velocities was found. The patients in this study received a slightly higher dose of anthracyclines, on the other hand the mean follow‐up period was 6.5 ± years, which was a shorter time than in our patient group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The impairment of diastolic function is similar as described in the above mentioned study, 11 but the authors also reported lower systolic parameters in subgroups with lower doses of anthracycline therapy in comparison to anthracycline‐naïve subjects. This was not observed in our study, even though the median anthracycline dose in our cohort was higher (200 vs. 120 mg/m 2 ).A recent study by Sofia et al 15 compared 20 CCS and 20 controls and described no differences in biplane LVEF calculated by Simpson's rule and global longitudinal strain (GLS), but using RT‐3D echocardiography demonstrated a significant difference in LVEF.However, the mean values of both CCS and controls were in a normal range and no difference between diastolic velocities was found. The patients in this study received a slightly higher dose of anthracyclines, on the other hand the mean follow‐up period was 6.5 ± years, which was a shorter time than in our patient group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The supplementation with ET in doxorubicin treated animals significantly lowered this doxorubicin-induced increase in MPI score. However, ET supplementation did not reduce this to levels of the saline controls possibly indicating a subclinical left ventricular cardiotoxicity [65]. Perhaps prolonged ET administration or longer observation period is required to demonstrate the efficacy of ET against late-onset cardiac dysfunction (which can occur decades after completion of anthracycline chemotherapy in humans).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge is the diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. There is no broad consensus on how cardiotoxicity should be measured in childhood cancer survivors, leading to heterogeneity between studies (70)(71)(72)(73)(74). Indeed, cardiotoxicity can be measured by a combination of different parameters, such as reduced resting systolic function, reduced resting diastolic dysfunction, impaired hemodynamics and systolic functional reserve measured during exercise or reduced exercise capacity or cardiopulmonary fitness (VO 2 peak).…”
Section: Primary Key Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%