2017
DOI: 10.1515/jce-2017-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Stem Cell-based Regenerative Therapy for the Ischemic Injured Heart — a Short Update 2017

Abstract: Cell therapy for the ischemic injured heart has been largely investigated in the last two decades, and most of the small cohort and randomized clinical studies, as well as meta-analyses led to the conclusion that cell-based human regenerative therapy is safe and effective in term of reducing adverse clinical outcomes and increasing left ventricular performance. Both the in vitro and in vivo rodent animal models of ischemic heart failure using bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells promised marvelous success in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of clinical trials have since demonstrated a good safety record for injecting stem cells into patients after myocardial infarction. Comprehensive surveys of these trials concluded an overall modest efficacy in improving cardiac function, indicating considerable variance and discrepancy with animal studies, while the long-term benefits remained uncertain [ 134 138 ]. For instance, of a dozen studies using injected bone marrow mononuclear cells, three noted an improved left ventricular ejection fraction, whereas other studies did not record differences in the patients' cardiac parameters, and the optimal timing of these injections after cardiac injury also remained unclear [ 135 ].…”
Section: Stem Cell Engraftment In the Cardiac Niche: Stem Cell Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of clinical trials have since demonstrated a good safety record for injecting stem cells into patients after myocardial infarction. Comprehensive surveys of these trials concluded an overall modest efficacy in improving cardiac function, indicating considerable variance and discrepancy with animal studies, while the long-term benefits remained uncertain [ 134 138 ]. For instance, of a dozen studies using injected bone marrow mononuclear cells, three noted an improved left ventricular ejection fraction, whereas other studies did not record differences in the patients' cardiac parameters, and the optimal timing of these injections after cardiac injury also remained unclear [ 135 ].…”
Section: Stem Cell Engraftment In the Cardiac Niche: Stem Cell Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in results is thought to be due to the source of stem cells. In animal trials, MSCs were harvested from healthy donors; however, in comparison in the clinical trials, the stem cells were collected from the patient with known atherosclerotic disease and potentially other serious co-morbidities [45]. Further research in this field continues to evolve to in order to create a successful therapy.…”
Section: Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem cells (SCs) have been proposed to represent a viable therapy option in these cases. However, despite the great enthusiasm at the beginning of the SC era, justified by promising initial results, this therapy has failed to demonstrate a significant benefit in large clinical trials[ 2 ]. This lack of significant clinical benefit was initially attributed to the different origins of the SCs and the different routes of delivery used in clinical trials[ 3 - 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%