1969
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.59.7.1177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac screening by computerized auscultation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this low prevalence as well as for the machine's erroneous de-labeling of children who have heart murmurs might be the low sensitivity of this screening device. Such a conclusion would be compatible with the sensitivity of 57 per cent as reported by Blackman et al 16 Henikoff, Stevens and Perry4 reported a similar value of 64 per cent for a single screening and an increase of 12 per cent when a repeat test was given. Other studies which suggest a high sensitivity for this machine are not supported by the current data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A possible explanation for this low prevalence as well as for the machine's erroneous de-labeling of children who have heart murmurs might be the low sensitivity of this screening device. Such a conclusion would be compatible with the sensitivity of 57 per cent as reported by Blackman et al 16 Henikoff, Stevens and Perry4 reported a similar value of 64 per cent for a single screening and an increase of 12 per cent when a repeat test was given. Other studies which suggest a high sensitivity for this machine are not supported by the current data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%