2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac rehabilitation costs

Abstract: More research is needed regarding the costs to deliver CR in community settings, the cost-effectiveness of CR in most countries, and the economic impact of return-to-work with CR participation. A low-cost model of CR should be standardized and tested for efficacy across multiple healthcare systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite various benefits of exercise-based CR, a very few facilities are offering outpatient (Phase II and III) CR in India 15 with a participation rate of just 13% 16 . This underutilization of outpatient CR program might be because of the low-income group,15, 17, 18, 19 low education,17, 18 time and distance constraints, 15 and poor awareness and referral by cardiologists for CR in middle-income countries such as India 17, 20. Most of these limitations can be overcome by using simple, safe, realistic, cost-effective, home-based, and self-monitored CR programs to increase participation, adherence, and completion of outpatient CR 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite various benefits of exercise-based CR, a very few facilities are offering outpatient (Phase II and III) CR in India 15 with a participation rate of just 13% 16 . This underutilization of outpatient CR program might be because of the low-income group,15, 17, 18, 19 low education,17, 18 time and distance constraints, 15 and poor awareness and referral by cardiologists for CR in middle-income countries such as India 17, 20. Most of these limitations can be overcome by using simple, safe, realistic, cost-effective, home-based, and self-monitored CR programs to increase participation, adherence, and completion of outpatient CR 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCR referral is a health care quality performance metric [ 5 , 6 ], yet for three decades, only 10% to 20% of eligible women have attended CBCR, with up to a 56% dropout rate [ 7 - 18 ]. CBCR underutilization stems from numerous intrapersonal, interpersonal, logistical, programmatic, and health system barriers [ 19 , 20 ]. Inadequate health insurance and copayments of up to US $250 per session deter women from CBCR participation [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBCR-eligible patients given the choice between HBCR and CBCR are up to four times more likely to participate in HBCR [ 40 - 42 ]. Compared with CBCR, HBCR overcomes logistical barriers to access, the need for expensive facilities, specialized exercise equipment, and high personnel costs and provides education, coaching, and monitoring by a health coach through, when available, wearable sensors and smartphones that are potentially operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week [ 20 , 43 ]. Moreover, HBCR assesses daily PA, whereas CBCR only measures supervised exercise sessions [ 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, home-based CR has been gradually accepted as an alternative to the more traditional center-based CR. Evidence has been accumulated that home-based CR programs are often as effective as center-based CR programs [ 12 - 15 ], and they may incur lower costs [ 16 , 17 ] (but see [ 18 ]). A practical barrier for traditional CR is also eliminated as patients can stay at home and contact doctors or trainers through information and communication technologies (ICTs) only when necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%