2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Phase Space Tomography: A novel method of assessing coronary artery disease utilizing machine learning

Abstract: BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) techniques are increasingly applied to cardiovascular (CV) medicine in arenas ranging from genomics to cardiac imaging analysis. Cardiac Phase Space Tomography Analysis (cPSTA), employing machine-learned linear models from an elastic net method optimized by a genetic algorithm, analyzes thoracic phase signals to identify unique mathematical and tomographic features associated with the presence of flow-limiting coronary artery disease (CAD). This novel approach does not re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The machine-learned algorithm cohort consisted of phase signals from 512 patients with 94 patients serving as the verification cohort. Blindly testing the cPSA System in the naïve verification cohort demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 74%-100%) and specificity of 62% (95% CI: 51%-74%) for the assessment of significant CAD, which is comparable to commonly performed standard of care functional testing ( Table 2 ) [ 7 9 ]. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 96% (95% CI: 85%-100%), and the PPV was 46% (95% CI: 33%-62%) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Cardiac Phase Space Analysismentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The machine-learned algorithm cohort consisted of phase signals from 512 patients with 94 patients serving as the verification cohort. Blindly testing the cPSA System in the naïve verification cohort demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 74%-100%) and specificity of 62% (95% CI: 51%-74%) for the assessment of significant CAD, which is comparable to commonly performed standard of care functional testing ( Table 2 ) [ 7 9 ]. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 96% (95% CI: 85%-100%), and the PPV was 46% (95% CI: 33%-62%) [ 7 ].…”
Section: Cardiac Phase Space Analysismentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The primary objective of the Coronary Artery Disease Learning and Algorithm Development (CADLAD) trial was designed to collect resting phase signals from eligible subjects using the PSR prior to ICA to machine learn and test an algorithm for detecting the presence of significant CAD in symptomatic patients [ 7 ]. In addition, machine-learned algorithms were developed and tested to identify the location of significant CAD.…”
Section: Cardiac Phase Space Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En este estudio, los autores utilizaron esta herramienta para evaluar a pacientes con enfermedad coronaria y dolor en el pecho que fueron remitidos por el médico para una angiografía. Se estudiaron 606 pacientes y los resultados mostraron 92% de sensibilidad, 62% de especificidad y 96% de valor predictivo de enfermedad coronaria 15,16,17,18 . La ecocardiografía es actualmente uno de los métodos de imagen más utilizados en cardiología, la ecografía también tiene ventajas en cuanto a su portabilidad, rapidez y accesibilidad.…”
Section: La Inteligencia Artificial En áReas Específicas De Saludunclassified
“…These variabilities pose a challenge to the AI system, in which their learned ground truth is dependent on these human interpretations. 1 Current studies using AI in cardiac imaging and diagnostics show great promise; [2][3][4] however, these studies might be limited to sample sizes at institutional or regionally distributed levels, or have not yet been externally validated by operators outside of the study or used on a separate population. 1 Second, in machine learning models in which algorithms are designed to recognise patterns, there is a tendency to overfit the dataset because of an inability to distinguish a true contributing factor from noise.…”
Section: Addressing Bias: Artificial Intelligence In Cardiovascular Mmentioning
confidence: 99%