2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-4011-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac output with modified cardio-impedance against inert gas rebreathing during sub-maximal and maximal cycling exercise in healthy and fit subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they concluded they could not be used interchangeably because of the great disparity in results at rest and in low-to-moderate intensity exercises. Unlike this study, Torto et al 15 showed that cardio-impedance could be less ideal for supramaximal exercise intensities.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…However, they concluded they could not be used interchangeably because of the great disparity in results at rest and in low-to-moderate intensity exercises. Unlike this study, Torto et al 15 showed that cardio-impedance could be less ideal for supramaximal exercise intensities.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…One proposed explanation for the measurement error is the recirculation of nitrous oxide into the pulmonary system during the rebreathing procedure (36). However, the reproducibility and reliability of the method have shown good results (33,50). Nevertheless, one should be cautious when interpreting the absolute values generated by the method, especially if one is attempting to derive other physiological parameters from the existing data on Qmax .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the main finding was that the ET-induced increase in V O 2peak was preserved despite removing the increase in Hb mass , and this conclusion is based on methods with low typical error ( V O 2peak 2.9% and Hb mass 1.1%). Impedance cardiography is associated with a larger measurement error than the invasive gold-standard methods (Del Torto et al 2019;Richard et al 2001). Besides, when calculating the a-v O 2 diff from V O 2 and Q inherent of its measurements errors, a larger measurement error is expected as compared with deriving a-vO 2 diff using arterial and venous blood sampling.…”
Section: Study Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%