2021
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac MRI in Patients with Prolonged Cardiorespiratory Symptoms after Mild to Moderate COVID-19

Abstract: Background Myocardial injury and inflammation on cardiac MRI in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) have been described in recent publications. Concurrently, a chronic COVID-19 syndrome (CCS) after COVID-19 infection has been observed manifesting with symptoms like fatigue and exertional dyspnea. Purpose To explore the relationship between CCS and myocardial injury and inflammation as an underlying cause of the persistent complaints in previously h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the studies presented two cohorts [ 8 , 10 , 21 , 31 ]; therefore, we included a total of 33 independent cohorts. Among the 29 included studies, nine were from the USA [ 8 , 15 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 32 , 36 38 ], six were from China [ 10 , 11 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 30 ], three each from the UK [ 19 , 22 , 26 ] and Germany [ 7 , 23 , 28 , 35 ], two each from Italy [ 9 , 27 ] and Turkey [ 29 , 31 ], and one each from Poland [ 17 ], Norway [ 34 ], Hungary [ 33 ] and Spain [ 25 ]. The publication year was 2020 or 2021 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of the studies presented two cohorts [ 8 , 10 , 21 , 31 ]; therefore, we included a total of 33 independent cohorts. Among the 29 included studies, nine were from the USA [ 8 , 15 , 20 , 22 , 24 , 32 , 36 38 ], six were from China [ 10 , 11 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 30 ], three each from the UK [ 19 , 22 , 26 ] and Germany [ 7 , 23 , 28 , 35 ], two each from Italy [ 9 , 27 ] and Turkey [ 29 , 31 ], and one each from Poland [ 17 ], Norway [ 34 ], Hungary [ 33 ] and Spain [ 25 ]. The publication year was 2020 or 2021 ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, 10.462 patients with COVID-19, including 1010 non-athletes and 9.452 athletes, and 746 controls were included in our analysis. A 1.5 T MR scanner was used in 15 studies [ 8 , 9 , 11 , 15 , 17 , 22 26 , 28 , 29 , 33 35 ] and a 3.0 T MR scanner was used in six studies [ 7 , 10 , 16 , 18 , 21 , 30 ], Both 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanners were used in one study [ 20 ] and data regarding MR scanners were not provided in seven studies [ 19 , 27 , 31 , 32 , 36 38 ]. As the myocardial native T1 time substantially differs between different magnetic field strengths and sequences [ 39 ], we investigated the number patients with abnormal T1 time, rather than those with absolute value of native T1 time, among the nine studies presenting the prevalence of patients with abnormal native T1 times [ 7 9 , 11 , 17 , 22 , 26 , 27 , 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have examined myocardial disease in patients who had recovered from COVID-19 [4][5][6][7] and have reported a broad range in prevalence of abnormal myocardial tissue characteristics (7%-73%). 5,6,8 However, there is limited understanding of persistent changes in myocardial metabolism in recovered patients, which is a potential concern given that COVID-19 is associated with systemic inflammation during the acute illness. Combined cardiac 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI can reliably characterize myocardial inflammation and its relationship to myocardial abnormalities on MRI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding cardiac damage that cannot be demonstrated in routine tests, in a cohort of 100 patients who recovered from COVID-19, 78% had cardiovascular involvement as detected by standardized cardiac MRI, irrespective of pre-existing conditions, the severity and overall course of the COVID-19 presentation, the time from the original diagnosis, or the presence of cardiac symptoms [ 42 ]. On the other hand, among 41 patients with dyspnea who had mild COVID-19 and were not hospitalized and 42 control participants, parameters indicating myocardial inflammation and edema were comparable between patients and control with no visible myocardial edema in any of the participants [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%