2008
DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance at High Field: Promises and Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the use of high efficiency balanced imaging sequences is routine at 1.5 tesla, but has proved challenging to implement at 3 tesla [12] and is likely to require sophisticated higher order shimming to be even feasible at 7 tesla. The lack of a body-coil for uniform excitation also makes many standard preparation modules for imaging sequences difficult: for example, black-blood imaging or quantitative velocity measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the use of high efficiency balanced imaging sequences is routine at 1.5 tesla, but has proved challenging to implement at 3 tesla [12] and is likely to require sophisticated higher order shimming to be even feasible at 7 tesla. The lack of a body-coil for uniform excitation also makes many standard preparation modules for imaging sequences difficult: for example, black-blood imaging or quantitative velocity measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of cardiac imaging, the pros and cons of moving from lower to higher magnetic fields have been discussed previously in [12] and references therein, comparing 1.5 and 3 tesla: such considerations are also pertinent when considering cardiac imaging at 7 tesla. Briefly, the advantages of higher fields include improved tagging due to the prolonged T 1 time of the myocardium, improved perfusion imaging both due to the increased signal-to-noise (S/N) and the longer myocardial T 1 values, and a higher velocity-to-noise ratio in blood velocity measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pulse sequences are adapted to 3T due to Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits, susceptibility, and motion artifacts and relaxometries of tissue and thus contrast at 3T. Compared with 1.5T MR, the use of higher magnetic field strength with a lower T1 relaxation curve allows more accurate determination of inversion time and shortens the delay time from 20 min with 1.5T to 5 min before starting the IR prepared 3D while‐heart scan (16, 24). Moreover, the higher signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) inherent at 3T can be used to offset the relative SNR loss that results from reduction in voxel size and the use of parallel imaging to shorten scan times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNR increases for both coronary MRI and LGE have been reported when imaging at higher fields . Although SNR increases between 30% and 60% have been reported , these differences in SNR have not translated to improved diagnostic quality .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%