2022
DOI: 10.2217/fca-2022-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Events and Economic Burden Among Patients With Hypertension and Treated Insomnia in the USA

Abstract: Background: Cardiovascular (CV) event risk, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs have not been elucidated among hypertension patients with treated insomnia (H + TI). Materials & methods: Adult patients with H + TI were identified in IBM MarketScan databases. H + TI patients were matched 1:1 on age and sex to controls with hypertension but without sleep disorders. Multivariable models were used to estimate associations between treated insomnia and CV event risk, HCRU and costs. Results: In total… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of improvement was evaluated for examining therapeutic efficacy in 16 studies [1][2][3][4][5]7,9,10] ; of which, 15 studies used the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15]18] In addition, 2 studies evaluated the rate of improvement, [1,10] and 4 studies evaluated PSQI scores during the follow-up period. [1,7,8,10] The quality of the data was not high.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The rate of improvement was evaluated for examining therapeutic efficacy in 16 studies [1][2][3][4][5]7,9,10] ; of which, 15 studies used the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15]18] In addition, 2 studies evaluated the rate of improvement, [1,10] and 4 studies evaluated PSQI scores during the follow-up period. [1,7,8,10] The quality of the data was not high.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20 studies, 9 studies [1,4,6,7,9,11,15,16] were randomized into groups using the random number table method, 1 study [13] was randomized into groups through random toss, 1 study [2] Figure was randomized according to the order of treatment, and 9 studies [3,5,8,10,12,14,17,18] did not mention the specific randomization method. Of the 20 studies, 1 study [6] used allocation concealment, whereas 19 studies [1][2][3][4][5][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] did not mention allocation concealment.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations