2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2161/1/012013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Disease Prediction using Supervised Machine Learning Techniques.

Abstract: Diagnosis of cardiac disease requires being more accurate, precise, and reliable. The number of death cases due to cardiac attacks is increasing exponentially day by day. Thus, practical approaches for earlier diagnosis of cardiac or heart disease are done to achieve prompt management of the disease. Various supervised machine learning techniques like K-Nearest Neighbour, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) model are used for predicting cardiac disease using a data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [ 36 ], the author claims that the DT model consistently beats the NB and SVM models. Its results show that SVM achieves 87% accuracy and DT achieves 90% accuracy, as shown in [ 37 ], while LR achieves the maximum accuracy in the prediction of heart disease at what time when equated to DT, SVM, NB, and KNN. The prediction accuracy provided by the RF-based framework is 97% [ 38 ], with a specificity of 88% and a sensitivity of 85% for the evaluation of congenital heart disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In [ 36 ], the author claims that the DT model consistently beats the NB and SVM models. Its results show that SVM achieves 87% accuracy and DT achieves 90% accuracy, as shown in [ 37 ], while LR achieves the maximum accuracy in the prediction of heart disease at what time when equated to DT, SVM, NB, and KNN. The prediction accuracy provided by the RF-based framework is 97% [ 38 ], with a specificity of 88% and a sensitivity of 85% for the evaluation of congenital heart disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The DT model, according to the author in [31], consistently outperforms the NB and SVM models. According to its findings, SVM achieves an accuracy of 87%, DT achieves an accuracy of 90%, and LR achieves the highest accuracy in heart disease prediction when compared to DT, NB, SVM, and KNN, as shown in [32]. For the assessment of congenital heart disease, the RF-based framework's prediction accuracy is 97 percent [33], with a specificity of 88 percent and a sensitivity of 85 percent.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The accuracy is computed as follows Accuracy = 𝑇𝑃+𝑇𝑁 𝑇𝑃+𝐹𝑃+𝑇𝑁+𝐹𝑁 (18) where 𝑇𝑃 defines true-positive, 𝑇𝑁 defines truenegative, 𝐹𝑃 defines false-positive, and 𝐹𝑁 defines false-negative. The sensitivity is computed as follows Sensitivity = 𝑇𝑃 𝑇𝑃+𝐹𝑁 (19) The specificity is computed as follows Specificity = 𝑇𝑁 𝑇𝑁+𝐹𝑃 (20) The precision is computed as follow Precision = 𝑇𝑃 𝑇𝑃+𝐹𝑃 (21) The F-measure is computed as follows…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17] is focused with design of the cardiac disease diagnosis decision support system. This research makes advantage of a stream of data from the OpenML repository that contains 1,000,000 records of cardiac illness and 14 characteristics [18][19][20]. Following the application of pre-processing and feature selection techniques, machine learning methods such as RF, DT, gradient boosted trees (GBT), SVM, LR, MLP utilised to evaluate the multi-classification and binary classification on the data stream [21][22][23].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%