2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac biomarkers in blood, and pericardial and cerebrospinal fluids of forensic autopsy cases: A reassessment with special regard to postmortem interval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [19] investigated comprehensively the cardiac markers from different samples taken from the body in a number of 1932 cases and showed that the level of each marker was higher in the blood collected from the bilateral heart chambers and in pericardial fluid than in blood from the iliac veins and it was even lower in the cerebrospinal fluid. Zhu et al [20] also determined the level of cTnT in cardiac cavities blood, peripheral blood and pericardial fluid, and from the total of 405 cases, 57 were diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [19] investigated comprehensively the cardiac markers from different samples taken from the body in a number of 1932 cases and showed that the level of each marker was higher in the blood collected from the bilateral heart chambers and in pericardial fluid than in blood from the iliac veins and it was even lower in the cerebrospinal fluid. Zhu et al [20] also determined the level of cTnT in cardiac cavities blood, peripheral blood and pericardial fluid, and from the total of 405 cases, 57 were diagnosed as acute myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies showed that cardiac Troponin T and I in cisternal CSF were slightly correlated with PMI up to 48 h post-mortem [47][48][49].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript E Cardiac Troponinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… PMI should be inferred from the actual time of death. Instead, time of death is sometimes estimated based on autopsy findings or data obtained from police investigation[31,[47][48][49]53], leading to biased estimates of PMI. Factors known to influence post-mortem changes are inconsistently considered.Discrepancies in the results might, for instance, arise from body refrigeration before CSF sampling, as cooling slows autolytic and metabolic processes (e.g. glycolysis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because cardiac troponin (cTn) has nearly absolute myocardial tissue specificity (Rallou et al, 2013), it is a recommended biomarker for the detection of myocardial necrosis (Thygesen et al, 2012), and has been recommended for the evaluation of the presence and extent of myocardial damage in various causes of death (Zhu et al, 2006). Antemortem biochemical estimation of cTn level in blood and pericardial fluid, as well as other cardiac muscle proteins, has been previously studied to identify myocardial ischemia as a cause of death The detection of the aforementioned protein markers to investigate myocardial injury in autopsy cases differs from that in clinical findings due to several influencing factors, as for example, the variation in sampling-site results (Chen et al, 2015). Immunohistochemical detection proved to be a better technique to forensic pathology to detect ischemic areas when assessing acute myocardial damage (Ribeiro-Silva et al 2002).…”
Section: Introduction Hementioning
confidence: 99%