Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary review of the literature from 2018

Avery, K Leslie; Balakrishnan, M.; Balu, Ramani; Chowdhury, Muhammad Abdul Baker; Crabb, David B.; Huesgen, Karl; Hwang, Charles W.; Maciel, Carolina B.; Murphy, Travis; Han, Francis; Becker, Torben K.; Gul, Sarah; Cohen, Scott; Youn, Teddy S.; Alviar, Carlos L.; Unzalu, Iker; Carson-Marino, Morgan; Guttenberg, Alexis; McPhee, Deja; Welch, Emily; Bhowmick, Sabuj; Elmelige, Yasmeen; Prabhu, Arjun; Buchalter, Daniel B.; Snipes, Garrett M.; Gargus, Nathan; Harrell, Caleb; Dollerschell, John T.; George, Ellen; Sites, Jeremy; Tule, Manjiri; Echavarría, María Isabel; Smith, Robert A.; Yazdanbakhsh, Kayvon; Reed, Austin; Hardy, Nicole; Davis, T.; Ormseth, Cora; Jefferson, Jamal; Zhou, Sonya E.; Velez, Lymaries

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.030

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, articles with either an 'Electronic Date of Publication' and/or 'Print Date of Publication' in 2020 were included. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were consistent with previous ICARE reviews [2,4]. Only articles that were available in English were included.…”

Section: Review Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research Review is not without limitation, including a significant heterogeneity in the nature of the studies included, and a lack of association with neurologic outcome after the 72-hour mark recommended in current guidelines [4,[26][27][28][29]. Further research dedicated to the association of given levels with degrees of injury and recovery after cardiac arrest in a clinical context will be needed to determine the prognostic significance of these laboratory values.…”

Section: Limitations the 2020 Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrestmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cardiac Arrest – An interdisciplinary scoping review of preclinical literature from 2020

Murphy¹,

Hwang²,

Cohen³

et al. 2022

J Pre Clin Clin Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction andObjective. The Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct an annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its third year, the goals of the review are to illustrate best practices in research and help reduce compartmentalization of knowledge by disseminating relevant advances in the interdisciplinary world of cardiac arrest research. This iteration focuses on pharmacology and basic and translational science contributions. Review methods. A search was conducted of PubMed using keywords related to cardiac arrest. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance with a focus on basic science and pharmacology. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of methodological quality and impact on the respective fields by reviewer teams lead by a subject matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99 percentiles by category were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors' and reviewers' scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Brief description of the state of knowledge. The top scoring studies centered around attempts at improving neurologic outcome through improved blood flow and reduction of metabolic demand in order to reduce the impact of hypoxia during resuscitation on the brain. Summary. The sheer number of articles screened is a testament to the need for an accessible source highlighting highquality and important research. Several high-quality systematic reviews and original research studies have provided a physiologic basis for the treatment of cardiac arrest, and make the case for focused progression of several pharmacologic treatments to larger animal and human trials.

show abstract

Section: Review Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Limitations the 2020 Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrestmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiac Arrest – An interdisciplinary scoping review of preclinical literature from 2020

Murphy¹,

Hwang²,

Cohen³

et al. 2022

J Pre Clin Clin Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Articles that were included in prior iterations were manually excluded by technical and section editors. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were consistent with previous ICARE reviews 2,4 . Only articles that were available in English were included.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The scoring scale originally adapted from the annual Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review and used in both prior ICARE reviews was again used according to the study type—original research or review 2–4 . Each article was scored independently by reviewers, and scores were verified by each section editor.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%