2023
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac and Kidney Adverse Effects of HIF Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Patients With CKD Not Receiving Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, our findings have important implications for understanding the clinical expression when categorizing sFas as a possible marker or even if it is a possible uremic retention solute and, thus, might contribute to the development of new studies that focus on pathophysiological processes, and possibly, the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD, as with newer ESA drugs [49][50][51].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, our findings have important implications for understanding the clinical expression when categorizing sFas as a possible marker or even if it is a possible uremic retention solute and, thus, might contribute to the development of new studies that focus on pathophysiological processes, and possibly, the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD, as with newer ESA drugs [49][50][51].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similar findings were reported by Takkavatakarn et al ., including unpublished data also [ 20 ]. In another meta-analysis limited to non-dialysis CKD patients, the risk of cardiac disorders was evaluated in 20 studies with 14 561 individuals, including 11 placebo-controlled trials [ 19 ]. When considering RCTs with ESA as comparator (nine studies with 9470 participants), as in the present meta-analysis, the authors found no difference in the cardiovascular risk between the HIF-PHIs and ESA arms [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another meta-analysis limited to non-dialysis CKD patients, the risk of cardiac disorders was evaluated in 20 studies with 14 561 individuals, including 11 placebo-controlled trials [ 19 ]. When considering RCTs with ESA as comparator (nine studies with 9470 participants), as in the present meta-analysis, the authors found no difference in the cardiovascular risk between the HIF-PHIs and ESA arms [ 19 ]. Therefore, based on our and previous findings, it is possible to exclude an evident cardiovascular safety signal in patients using HIF-PHIs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another meta-analysis of seven trials including 7,933 patients indicated that daprodustat might have a better impact on dialysis-dependent patients in optimizing iron metabolism despite being non-inferior in improving anemia in both DD and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) patients ( Fu et al, 2022 ). While a meta-analysis that included 14 studies indicated that DD patients using HIF-PHIs had a higher risk of serious adverse reactions compared to those using EPO ( Wu et al, 2022 ), a new meta-analysis containing 23 studies showed a significant difference in the risk of cardiac and kidney-related AEs in NDD patients ( Zheng et al, 2023 ), while there is still a lack of direct comparison between HIF-PHIs, which restricts the clinical application of these agents in DD patients. Therefore, to provide evidence for their safety in clinical application, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs comparing HIF-PHIs versus ESAs, to summarize their pairwise comparison and overall safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%