1999
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-8-199910190-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac and Arterial Target Organ Damage in Adults with Elevated Ambulatory and Normal Office Blood Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
129
3
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
129
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of whether outof-office BP is measured by HBP or ABP, the risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event is similar to that observed in patients with sustained hypertension (Figure 1). These findings strengthen the observations from numerous earlier crosssectional studies that linked MH with target organ damage (14,15). Taken together, it is clear that both HBP and ABP predict cardiovascular risk better than OBP.…”
Section: What Is the Risk Associated With Mh?supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of whether outof-office BP is measured by HBP or ABP, the risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event is similar to that observed in patients with sustained hypertension (Figure 1). These findings strengthen the observations from numerous earlier crosssectional studies that linked MH with target organ damage (14,15). Taken together, it is clear that both HBP and ABP predict cardiovascular risk better than OBP.…”
Section: What Is the Risk Associated With Mh?supporting
confidence: 79%
“…When the level of the OBP has been taken into consideration, studies reporting a link between MH and target organ damage show that OBP is commonly in the high normal range when MH is present (14,20). This finding may have clinical significance.…”
Section: What Is the Risk Associated With Mh?mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Cross-sectional studies have reported an increased incidence of precursors of cardiovascular disease such as left ventricular hypertrophy. [12][13][14][15][16][17] However, prospective studies appear to offer the best opportunity in which to detect an effect and reported studies are divided into those who find that the white-coat effect has adverse consequences for cardiovascular disease [18][19][20] and those that find that it does not. 6,[21][22][23][24][25][26] We have previously reported 11-year mortality data in the General Practice Hypertension Study Group (GPHSG) in subjects with transiently raised clinic DBP, and found the relative risk of cardiovascular death compared with controls was 1.5 in men and 0.7 in women compared to normotensive controls 27 but these results were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few studies reporting the possible association between masked hypertension and cardiac and carotid arterial structural changes in the general population. Liu et al 23 found that LV mass and carotid wall thickness in patients with masked hypertension were significantly greater than those in true normotensive subjects and similar to those in patients with sustained hypertension. The data from the PAMELA Study also showed that LVMI was Figure 3 Comparison of LV geometric patterns between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%