2021
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary and the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer

Abstract: Objective In the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Head and Neck Cancer, the classification for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) changed in addition to oropharyngeal carcinomas. The current classification considers extranodal extension (ENE), determination of p16 (surrogate marker for human papillomavirus), and detection of Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the new classification on the prognosis of p16‐positive and p16‐negative CUP and the impact of EBV pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(105 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective study, Sivars et al showed a significantly better 5-year OS for HPV-positive CUPs in comparison to HPV-negative CUPs (80% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.004) [ 37 ]. Axelsson et al confirmed these results in the review of the Swedish Cancer Registry with a total of 68 patients, which are also consistent with the analysis of Cheraghlou et al of the National Cancer Database of the United states with a total of 978 patients [ 8 , 38 , 39 ]. In our cohort, we were not able to demonstrate any advantage in the multiple analysis either for HPV-positive or -negative HNCUPs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In a retrospective study, Sivars et al showed a significantly better 5-year OS for HPV-positive CUPs in comparison to HPV-negative CUPs (80% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.004) [ 37 ]. Axelsson et al confirmed these results in the review of the Swedish Cancer Registry with a total of 68 patients, which are also consistent with the analysis of Cheraghlou et al of the National Cancer Database of the United states with a total of 978 patients [ 8 , 38 , 39 ]. In our cohort, we were not able to demonstrate any advantage in the multiple analysis either for HPV-positive or -negative HNCUPs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In a retrospective study, Sivars et al showed a significantly better 5-year OS for HPV-positive CUPs in comparison to HPV-negative CUPs (80% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.004) [37]. Axelsson et al confirmed these results in the review of the Swedish Cancer Registry with a total of 68 patients, which are also consistent with the analysis of Cheraghlou et al of the National Cancer Database of the United states with a total of 978 patients [8,38,39]. In our cohort, we were not able to demonstrate any advantage in the multiple analysis either for HPV-positive or -negative HNCUPs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Alterations of the tumor staging from UICC7 to UICC8 included mainly UICC stage III or IVa according to the 7 th edition. Our patient remained at the same stage UICC IVc, and had in both tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) classifications the lowest OS (OS UICC IVc TNM7 12 mo; OS UICC IVc TNM8 5 mo[ 16 ]). But regardless of p16 status, the addition of cetuximab to radiation therapy improved patient outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%