1980
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800670210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma of the tongue: Factors affecting the results of surgical treatment

Abstract: Sixty-five cases of carcinoma of the tongue treated by surgery were reviewed. The types of operation included hemiglossectomy, subtotal and total glossectomy with or without hemimandibulectomy and laryngectomy. Simultaneous neck dissection was usually performed except for patients who had radiotherapy and did not have clinical lymph node involvement. The hospital mortality and five-year survival rates were analysed for individual subgroups of patients classified according to clinical and pathological features.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognosis of the dorsal tongue carcinoma was worse in a study carried out in Hong Kong in 65 tongue cancer patients treated by surgery. The 5-year survival rate of patients with the ventrolateral tongue cancer was 51%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for the dorsal tongue cancer was 0% [21]. On the contrary, as for the treatment outcomes of mobile tongue leukoplakia in the present study, the prognosis in these two sites was not significantly different, including the postoperative recurrence rate (11.11% vs. 14.29%, P = 1.0), cumulative malignant transformation rate (7.41% vs. 2.25%, P = 0.22), and ATR (2.32% vs. 0.64%, P = 0.099, Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The prognosis of the dorsal tongue carcinoma was worse in a study carried out in Hong Kong in 65 tongue cancer patients treated by surgery. The 5-year survival rate of patients with the ventrolateral tongue cancer was 51%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for the dorsal tongue cancer was 0% [21]. On the contrary, as for the treatment outcomes of mobile tongue leukoplakia in the present study, the prognosis in these two sites was not significantly different, including the postoperative recurrence rate (11.11% vs. 14.29%, P = 1.0), cumulative malignant transformation rate (7.41% vs. 2.25%, P = 0.22), and ATR (2.32% vs. 0.64%, P = 0.099, Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lam 25 noted that SCC of the dorsum may carry a worse prognosis than SCC of the lateral surface or ventral undersurface. Lesions on the lateral aspect and undersurface had a 5-year survival of 51%, whereas those with SCC of the dorsum had a 5-year survival of 0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis of dorsal tongue carcinoma was worse in a study carried out in Hong Kong on the 65 tongue cancer patients treated by surgery. The 5-year survival of patients with ventrolateral tongue cancer was 51%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for the dorsal tongue cancer was 0% [17]. On the contrary, as for the treatment outcomes of mobile tongue leukoplakia in the present study, the prognosis in these two sites was not signi cantly different, including the postoperative recurrence rate (17.5% VS 21.37%, P = 0.66), cumulative malignant transformation rate (7.5% VS 7.69%, P = 0.49), and ATR (2.86% VS 1.93%, P = 0.28, Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%