1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)64178-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Continuing Co-Operative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The administration of estrogenic substances can not only decrease the size of prostatic cancer significantly, but also the size of canine prostatic tumors (153). Although Scott (154) concluded that total prostatectomy plus combined endocrine therapy (estrogen treatment and orchiectomy) was the method of choice for the treatment of patients with either advanced prostatic carcinoma or nodular lesions presumably confined within the capsule, the Veterans Administration Cooperative Urologic Research Group (155) found that the effect of combined orchiectomy‐estrogen therapy for carcinoma of the prostate was not appreciably better than that of estrogen administration alone. Robson (40) reported a striking decrease of prostatic carcinoma among patients with severe cirrhosis (and presumably more secondary hyperestrinism) than among patients with less severe cirrhosis.…”
Section: Prostatic Carcinoma—possible Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The administration of estrogenic substances can not only decrease the size of prostatic cancer significantly, but also the size of canine prostatic tumors (153). Although Scott (154) concluded that total prostatectomy plus combined endocrine therapy (estrogen treatment and orchiectomy) was the method of choice for the treatment of patients with either advanced prostatic carcinoma or nodular lesions presumably confined within the capsule, the Veterans Administration Cooperative Urologic Research Group (155) found that the effect of combined orchiectomy‐estrogen therapy for carcinoma of the prostate was not appreciably better than that of estrogen administration alone. Robson (40) reported a striking decrease of prostatic carcinoma among patients with severe cirrhosis (and presumably more secondary hyperestrinism) than among patients with less severe cirrhosis.…”
Section: Prostatic Carcinoma—possible Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%