2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinogenetic impact of alcohol intake on squamous cell carcinoma risk of the oesophagus in relation to tobacco smoking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on the types of alcoholic beverage ingested, the amount of ethanol in each type of beverage, the average frequency of intake per week and the number of drinks per day, were obtained and converted to the total consumption of alcohol in grams per day, as previously described. 7 …”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data on the types of alcoholic beverage ingested, the amount of ethanol in each type of beverage, the average frequency of intake per week and the number of drinks per day, were obtained and converted to the total consumption of alcohol in grams per day, as previously described. 7 …”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Although the biological mechanisms underlying alcoholinduced carcinogenesis have not been defined fully, DNA damage by carcinogenic acetaldehyde (the pivotal metabolite of ethanol) is one of the powerful events for the development of upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) neoplasms. 8,9 In an experimental study, a 7-folds higher level of acetaldehyde-DNA adduct has been detected in heavy alcohol drinkers than in controls.…”
Section: Uiccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking has been extensively studied, and it has been suggested that they interact in a multiplicative manner with respect to the risk of esophageal cancer (De Stefani et al 1990;Lee et al 2007;Brown et al 2008). However, Steevens et al (2010) found no interaction effect in their prospective study of the risk of adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three hundred and seventeen newly pathologically proven ESCC patients (301 males and 16 females) were recruited from two medical centers in the Kaohsiung metropolitan area in southern Taiwan, including the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH) and the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (KVGH) between 2000 and 2007. The detailed information was described elsewhere [18] . Patients with newly pathologically proven oral SCC (n = 199), gastric (n = 196) and colon adenocarcinoma (n = 240) were recruited from the KMUH in the same period.…”
Section: Selection Of Cases and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%