2019
DOI: 10.1111/johs.12222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carceral Kinship: Future Families of the Late Leviathan

Abstract: This essay examines the monstrous first as a figure haunting Western legal history, stripped of rights and often merging with the animal, and second, as a divergent sociality borne of emergencies, crises, and faultlines of late liberal governmentality. In particular I ask how the figure of the pathological and violent gang member structures debates about the US‐Mexico border crosser, and the limits of humanity before the law. The essay moves from a genealogy of the gang member in Honduras, to the refugee asylu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The marero rejects expectations with a new, irreverent, cynical, and arrogant discourse. The figure of the marero constructed an antagonistic social imaginary against official power and the neoliberal capitalist discourse of the government (Carter 2019b; Pine 2008). Yet maras also replicate many hegemonic ideas: the use of violence to solve disputes, men as both protectors and disciplinarians, a taxation system which serves to both fund the activities of those in power and serve as a proxy measure of loyalty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marero rejects expectations with a new, irreverent, cynical, and arrogant discourse. The figure of the marero constructed an antagonistic social imaginary against official power and the neoliberal capitalist discourse of the government (Carter 2019b; Pine 2008). Yet maras also replicate many hegemonic ideas: the use of violence to solve disputes, men as both protectors and disciplinarians, a taxation system which serves to both fund the activities of those in power and serve as a proxy measure of loyalty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%