2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcass damage and digested bone from mountain lions (Felis concolor): implications for carcass persistence on landscapes as a function of prey age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This highly generalized dietary behaviour is consistent with observed dietary behaviour in modern cougars [2]. Specifically, cougars today are both opportunistic predators [2] and scavengers of their own kills from cache sites or abandoned carrion [2,16], more fully consuming carcasses of smaller-to medium-sized prey and/or juveniles [2,17]. Similar dental microwear attributes in rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org Biol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This highly generalized dietary behaviour is consistent with observed dietary behaviour in modern cougars [2]. Specifically, cougars today are both opportunistic predators [2] and scavengers of their own kills from cache sites or abandoned carrion [2,16], more fully consuming carcasses of smaller-to medium-sized prey and/or juveniles [2,17]. Similar dental microwear attributes in rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org Biol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…As such, in any of the previous cases the presence and analysis of skeletal remains in scats can prove advantageous. Furthermore, as we have previously noted, some authors have observed discrepancies between identified bones and hair content in scats (Mondini and Sebastián Muñoz, 2008;Stiner et al, 2011). Results obtained from the analysis of skeletal remains, can potentially provide us data about prey-species, body size, age groups, skeletal representation and NMI of prey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Mondini and Sebastián Muñoz, 2008 consider that any bone fragments that the puma swallowed from mature carcasses were simply too small to be recognized. Stiner et al (2011) noted that in the sample of hair and bones studied, the larger prey and hare were identified from hair only (nevertheless, it should be noted that, unlike the wolf, gnawing damage produced by puma in prey carcasses is comparatively light overall). In the present study, recovery of the hair of consumed prey was not possible; the data presented were obtained from the analysis of the bones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations