1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1395(199606)9:6<319::aid-poc786>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbonylmetallates and carbanions in aromatic and vinylic nucleophilic substitution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, the extent of substitution can be ordered by careful control of the reagents nucleophilicity and the reaction conditions and is summarized in Figure 1. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In general, there are few approaches reported to selectively afford mono-substitution of HFB, while disubstitution is generally obtained under mild conditions at room temperature. Stronger bases, longer reaction times, higher temperatures and a greater concentration of thiols can orient the reaction toward tetrasubstitution while hexa-substitution can be achieved with even harsher conditions and a larger excess of thiols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the extent of substitution can be ordered by careful control of the reagents nucleophilicity and the reaction conditions and is summarized in Figure 1. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In general, there are few approaches reported to selectively afford mono-substitution of HFB, while disubstitution is generally obtained under mild conditions at room temperature. Stronger bases, longer reaction times, higher temperatures and a greater concentration of thiols can orient the reaction toward tetrasubstitution while hexa-substitution can be achieved with even harsher conditions and a larger excess of thiols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Ir(ppy) 3 and Cat A could proceed through an oxidative quenching path, 30 despite a slight underpotential (C 5 F 5 N –2.17 vs. Ir(ppy) 3 – 2.01 and Cat A –1.94, E 1/2 vs. SCE). 31 While a reductive quenching of these photocatalysts by the amine is possible (EtNiPr 2 + 0.68 vs. 0.51 (Ir(ppy) 3 ), 0.27 ( Cat A ), E 1/2 vs. SCE) 32 this process is even more endothermic. The photoexcited state of Cat B is less reducing (–1.70 V vs. SCE) and less likely to undergo reductive quenching but is more oxidizing (0.58 V vs. SCE) and still undergoes efficient coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aromatic nucleophilic substitution in polyfluoroarenes is known to proceed in a step-wise addition-elimination process; addition of the nucleophile is usually a rate-determine stage. 17,18 The regioselectivity of substitution of fluorine in monosubstituted pentafluorobenzenes (C 6 F 5 X) is governed mainly by the other fluorine atoms rather that the group X, with the exception of powerful electron-donating groups. 6 Probably for similar reasons, the starting sulfoxide (1 or 2) and phenoxyderivative (4 or 6, respectively) demonstrated very similar reaction capabilities.…”
Section: Mechanistic Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%