2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1452-3981(23)13438-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbonation Rate and Reinforcing Steel Corrosion of Concretes with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Supplementary Cementing Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The depletion of portlandite caused by the concurrent pozzolanic reaction and carbonation causes the structure of the calcium silicate hydrate to deteriorate due to decalcification, weakening the microstructure of the concrete. For example, Arredondo-Rea et al [35] showed that despite the improvement in porosity, RA mixes containing SCMs carbonate faster than mixes without SCMs (e.g., 30% increase for fly ash). Therefore, the problem of carbonation is more complex than the sole determination of the porosity of RAC.…”
Section: Carbonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depletion of portlandite caused by the concurrent pozzolanic reaction and carbonation causes the structure of the calcium silicate hydrate to deteriorate due to decalcification, weakening the microstructure of the concrete. For example, Arredondo-Rea et al [35] showed that despite the improvement in porosity, RA mixes containing SCMs carbonate faster than mixes without SCMs (e.g., 30% increase for fly ash). Therefore, the problem of carbonation is more complex than the sole determination of the porosity of RAC.…”
Section: Carbonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In concretes made with blast-furnace slag values even higher than 20 mA m −2 were determined [7]. At 95% and 65% R.H., a more modest increase of corrosion current density was observed in concrete made with fly ash in comparison with concrete with Portland cement [21,22]. Hence, due to the growing interest in supplementary cementitious materials, SCMs, to improve the sustainability of RC structures, and the limited studies carried out on SCMs, the influence of the type of binder on the corrosion current density in different exposure conditions needs to be further investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As it can be observed, data regarding the corrosion current density of reinforcement in carbonated concrete mainly refer to laboratory tests, while data in concretes exposed to natural environments are scarce [20]. Furthermore, often Portland cement was considered in the tests, while studies on blended cements are in a limited number, especially for natural pozzolan, limestone and silica fume and very few works allow a direct comparison between concretes made with Portland cement and blended cements [7,[12][13][14]21,22]. In immersed conditions, generally higher corrosion current densities were observed in blended cement compared to Portland cement; for instance, the corrosion current density increased from about 10 mA m −2 in Portland cement concrete to 20 mA m −2 in fly ash concrete [12][13][14] or from about 5 mA m −2 in Portland cement concrete to 7 mA m −2 in fly ash concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few works allow a direct comparison between concretes made with Portland cement and blended cements. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Usually the studies showed higher corrosion rate in blended cement compared to Portland cement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%