2017
DOI: 10.2175/193864717822158152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon vs Membrane: A pilot scale comparison of two different treatment strategies for managed aquifer recharge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the limited capacity of conventional water treatment (coagulation–sedimentation–filtration–chlorination) to remove ACSs [6], researchers evaluated their enhanced removal by advanced technologies including ozone/permanganate/ferrate oxidation [10,11,12], activated carbon/metal organic framework materials/magnetic ion exchange resin adsorption [1,13], UV photolysis [14], advanced oxidation [15,16,17], and membrane filtration [18]. Among these technologies, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and reverse osmosis (RO) were proved to work best (~10 −2 min −1 for AOPs and rejection rate > 90% for RO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the limited capacity of conventional water treatment (coagulation–sedimentation–filtration–chlorination) to remove ACSs [6], researchers evaluated their enhanced removal by advanced technologies including ozone/permanganate/ferrate oxidation [10,11,12], activated carbon/metal organic framework materials/magnetic ion exchange resin adsorption [1,13], UV photolysis [14], advanced oxidation [15,16,17], and membrane filtration [18]. Among these technologies, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and reverse osmosis (RO) were proved to work best (~10 −2 min −1 for AOPs and rejection rate > 90% for RO).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%