2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon tax and revenue recycling: Impacts on households in British Columbia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A State can decide to Bshift the tax burden from employment, income and investment, to pollution, resource depletion and waste^as proposed by UNEP (UNEP 2015, 183) or to keep the consumption tax revenue unchanged, or even to reduce it. The State can also decide to introduce the shift Bslowly, over a couple of decades^ (UNEP 2015, 183) or to implement it more quickly as it has been the case with carbon tax in British Columbia, where the initial rate 10 CAN $/tCO 2 eq fixed in 2008 has been increased annually by 5 CAN $/tCO 2 eq per year during 4 years to reach 30 CAN $/tCO 2 eq in 2012 (Beck et al 2015).…”
Section: Respect For National Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A State can decide to Bshift the tax burden from employment, income and investment, to pollution, resource depletion and waste^as proposed by UNEP (UNEP 2015, 183) or to keep the consumption tax revenue unchanged, or even to reduce it. The State can also decide to introduce the shift Bslowly, over a couple of decades^ (UNEP 2015, 183) or to implement it more quickly as it has been the case with carbon tax in British Columbia, where the initial rate 10 CAN $/tCO 2 eq fixed in 2008 has been increased annually by 5 CAN $/tCO 2 eq per year during 4 years to reach 30 CAN $/tCO 2 eq in 2012 (Beck et al 2015).…”
Section: Respect For National Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is, however, contested as the efficiency of the consumption taxes enables public authorities to implement compensation and redistribution schemes (Bankman and Weisbach 2005;Decoster et al 2010;Corbacho et al 2013). Those schemes are in particular needed in the case of the development of environmental consumption taxes (Ekins and Dresner 2004;West and Williams 2004;Büchs et al 2011;Kosonen 2012;Dissou and Siddiqui 2014;Beck et al 2015;Yusuf and Resosudarmo 2015). In the DaVAT framework, the important thing to keep in mind is that the increase in most polluting products' prices is associated with a decrease in the price of the (most numerous) low-polluting products previously subject to VAT, which has redistributive properties.…”
Section: Acceptability Of the Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…British Columbia recycled proceedings of its carbon tax both in redistribution and in a reduction of conventional taxes. The result was an estimated small macroeconomic cost and a progressive incidence (Beck et al, 2015). When governments engage in this type of reform, it is important for political acceptability that they communicate it adequately (Harrison, 2012).…”
Section: Carbon Pricing As a Fiscal Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this understanding is important in its own right, it is of added benefit when one considers revenue 'recycling' measures to redistribute carbon tax receipts via the tax-benefit system [2,6]. Existing revenue recycling mechanisms and associated analyses have focussed on providing a progressive post-redistribution pattern of incidence [2,6,11,19], showing that many redistributive mechanisms yield a net benefit for many income groups in aggregate. Despite this pattern of incidence, losers may still prevail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in this field have generally focussed on incorporating further sources of emission or incorporating a behavioural response to price changes. Indirect consumption of CO 2 embedded in goods and services has been incorporated through integration with an input-output or CGE model [2,7,11,21,24,26,38,43]. [23] analyse the distributional effects of taxing multiple greenhouse gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%