“…3), which is attributed to the relatively higher growth rate of broadleaf species. Carbon storage in litter in this study ranged from 0.8 to 3.2 Mg ha -1 , which is consistent with other litter carbon estimations (Nosetto et al 2006, Bisbing et al 2010, Zhang and Wang 2010. In the present study, carbon stored in litter was higher in the LG and PT plantations than in the PD plantation (Fig.…”
Section: Aboveground and Belowground Carbonsupporting
Selection of tree species is an important management decision for increasing carbon storage in regional planting programs in China. This study quantifies above and belowground carbon storage by several species in the Desertification Combating Program around Beijing and Tianjin (DCBT). Results show that the total carbon storage of the Pinus davidiana plantation was significantly higher than that of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica but not significantly differ from plantations of Pinus tabulaeformis and Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii. Most of the carbon was in the aboveground biomass. These results suggest that tree species have substantial influences on carbon storage, and that species should be considered in improving carbon sequestration potential for afforestation/reforestation projects.
“…3), which is attributed to the relatively higher growth rate of broadleaf species. Carbon storage in litter in this study ranged from 0.8 to 3.2 Mg ha -1 , which is consistent with other litter carbon estimations (Nosetto et al 2006, Bisbing et al 2010, Zhang and Wang 2010. In the present study, carbon stored in litter was higher in the LG and PT plantations than in the PD plantation (Fig.…”
Section: Aboveground and Belowground Carbonsupporting
Selection of tree species is an important management decision for increasing carbon storage in regional planting programs in China. This study quantifies above and belowground carbon storage by several species in the Desertification Combating Program around Beijing and Tianjin (DCBT). Results show that the total carbon storage of the Pinus davidiana plantation was significantly higher than that of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica but not significantly differ from plantations of Pinus tabulaeformis and Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii. Most of the carbon was in the aboveground biomass. These results suggest that tree species have substantial influences on carbon storage, and that species should be considered in improving carbon sequestration potential for afforestation/reforestation projects.
“…In another study in northwestern USA (western Montana), carbon stocks in old-growth (stand age 185 to 200 years) and second-growth (stand age 30 to 45 years) stands of western larch and Douglas fir were investigated (Bisbing et al 2010). In three study areas, 15 paired stands were studied.…”
Section: Direct Evidence Of Carbon Accumulation In Old Forest: Eddy Cmentioning
“…Past studies have reported large reservoirs of mineral soil C in old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwestern USA Harmon et al 2004;Sun et al 2004;Bisbing et al 2010) and coastal and interior western redcedar and hemlock forests (Trofymow and Blackwell 1998;Trofymow et al 2008;Stevenson et al 2010) (Jull et al 2002;Feller 2003;Stevenson et al 2010). A global meta-analysis found that mineral soil C increased with stand age in boreal and temperate forests with the oldest stands showing the greatest soil C (Pregitzer and Euskirchen 2004).…”
Section: Dead Organic Matter Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest ecosystem C can decline by up to nearly 60% in response to clear-cut harvesting relative to old-growth stands because of the significant reduction in aboveground live-tree C Fredeen et al 2005;Gough et al 2008;Bisbing et al 2010). …”
Section: Past Findings Of Management Impact On Carbon Stocks In Old-gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite detailed assessments of forest C stocks in temperate old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwestern USA (Harmon et al 1990;Smithwick et al 2002;Harmon et al 2004;Bisbing et al 2010), Australia (Turner and Lambert 1986;Turner et al 1992;Mackey et al 2008;Keith et al 2009), and New Zealand (Silvester and Orchard 1999;Davis et al 2003),…”
Section: Current Knowledge Gaps In the Assessment Of Forest Carbon Inmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.