2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gc010896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Storage in Earth's Deep Interior Implied by Carbonate‐Silicate‐Iron Melt Miscibility

A. H. Davis,
N. V. Solomatova,
R. Caracas
et al.

Abstract: Carbonate melts have been proposed to exist in the lower mantle, but their interaction with other lower mantle melt compositions is poorly understood. To understand miscibility in the carbonate‐silicate‐metal melt system, we simulate endmember, binary, and ternary melt mixtures and study how their Gibbs free energies of mixing evolve with pressure. We find that carbonate‐metal and carbonate‐silicate melts have miscibility gaps that close with increasing pressure, while silicate‐metal melts are immiscible at al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both Dorfman et al 20 and Zhu et al, 22 carbonates reacted with iron to make iron carbides and diamonds. Similarly, in ab initio molecular dynamics studies of a carbonate-silicate-metal melt by Davis et al, 56,64 carbonate, silicate, and metallic melts interact to form carbon and iron clusters indicative of dense Fe−C liquids and diamond nucleation. However, in this work, we see no evidence of diamond formation in either the XRD data or the EDS measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In both Dorfman et al 20 and Zhu et al, 22 carbonates reacted with iron to make iron carbides and diamonds. Similarly, in ab initio molecular dynamics studies of a carbonate-silicate-metal melt by Davis et al, 56,64 carbonate, silicate, and metallic melts interact to form carbon and iron clusters indicative of dense Fe−C liquids and diamond nucleation. However, in this work, we see no evidence of diamond formation in either the XRD data or the EDS measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%