2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon storage and stand conversion in a pine-dominated boreal forest landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques. Exploratory scatter plots and previous analyses (Allard and Park 2013, Park, 2015 suggested that red pine and jack pine data had different variance structures. We therefore used generalized least squares regressions (GLS; Zuur et al 2009) to investigate the effects of dominant overstory species, stand age, canopy closure, litter cover, litter depth, and soil organic matter on stand-level TD and FD indices (Questions 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques. Exploratory scatter plots and previous analyses (Allard and Park 2013, Park, 2015 suggested that red pine and jack pine data had different variance structures. We therefore used generalized least squares regressions (GLS; Zuur et al 2009) to investigate the effects of dominant overstory species, stand age, canopy closure, litter cover, litter depth, and soil organic matter on stand-level TD and FD indices (Questions 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Understory diversity was sampled as part of a larger project to compare ecosystem carbon storage across the jack pine and red pine chronosequence (full details in Park 2015). At each site, living and dead trees ≥ 1.5 m tall were completely enumerated in a 12.62 m radius (500 m 2 ) permanent sampling plot (PSP) that conformed to the design criteria of Manitoba Conservation's Forest Inventory Program (Manitoba Conservation, unpublished document; see Figure 1).…”
Section: Sampling Trees Environment and Understory Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed (Gao et al 2014;Park 2015). Previous studies found that carbon stock in the understory (shrubs and herbs) decreased with the increase in stand age (Cao et al 2012;Taylor et al 2007).…”
Section: Carbon Allocation and Dynamics In Ecosystem Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of the differences among species in what regards carbon sequestration and effects produced in each carbon pool of the ecosystem, should be a decision support tool when introducing new forest species and can be used strategically to reach environmental goals (Oostra et al, 2006;Schulp et al, 2008;Vallet et al, 2009;Herrero et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2016). Species replacement implies changes in carbon stocks in forest biomass and soils (Peltoniemi et al, 2004;Park, 2015), because tree species and litter quantity, quality and distribution in soil horizons have high influence in carbon storage (Lal, 2005;Oostra et al, 2006;Fonseca and Figueiredo, 2018). Decomposition rate of plant residues can be slower or faster, depending on their nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%