Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in Kenyan Forests and Wooded Grasslands Derived from Earth Observation and Model-Data Fusion

Abstract

The characterization of carbon stocks and dynamics at the national level is critical for countries engaging in climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. However, several tropical countries, including Kenya, lack the essential information typically provided by a complete national forest inventory. Here we present the most detailed and rigorous national-scale assessment of aboveground woody biomass carbon stocks and dynamics for Kenya to date. A non-parametric random forest algorithm was trained to retrieve aboveground woody biomass carbon (AGBC) for the year 2014 ± 1 and forest disturbances for the 2014–2017 period using in situ forest inventory plot data and satellite Earth Observation (EO) data. The ecosystem carbon cycling of Kenya’s forests and wooded grassland were assessed using a model-data fusion framework, CARDAMOM, constrained by the woody biomass datasets from this study as well as time series information on leaf area, fire events and soil organic carbon. Our EO-derived AGBC stocks were estimated as 140 Mt C for forests and 199 Mt C for wooded grasslands. The total AGBC loss during the study period was estimated as 1.89 Mt C with a dispersion below 1%. The CARDAMOM analysis estimated woody productivity to be three times larger in forests (mean = 1.9 t C ha−1 yr−1) than wooded grasslands (0.6 t C ha−1 yr−1), and the mean residence time of woody C in forests (16 years) to be greater than in wooded grasslands (10 years). This study stresses the importance of carbon sequestration by forests in the international climate mitigation efforts under the Paris Agreement, but emphasizes the need to include non-forest ecosystems such as wooded grasslands in international greenhouse gas accounting frameworks.

Risks to carbon storage from land-use change revealed by peat thickness maps of Peru

“…To account for the uncertainty associated with our estimate of peat thickness distribution, we ran a k-fold analysis as in 50 , splitting the data into 1,000 folds, and therefore generating 1,000 predictions of peat thickness per pixel. We took the median, 5th and 95th percentiles of the 1,000 predictions to represent our best estimate (Fig.…”

Woody Aboveground Biomass Mapping of the Brazilian Savanna with a Multi-Sensor and Machine Learning Approach

“…These were the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalised burn ratio (NBR), normalised difference moisture index (NDMI), and the soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). These indices have previously been used in similar studies [21,23,[71][72][73]].…”

“…These EO datasets were resampled, co-registered, and stacked at 30-m spatial resolutions ( Figure 2). We used the LiDAR AGB pixels (N = 2,973) as training and test samples in a regression version of the random forest (RF) algorithm [76] in the Google Earth Engine [77], which was implemented within a k-fold cross-validation framework [73]. The following variables were used as predictors in the model: γ 0 HV ; γ 0 HH ; RFDI; CpR from the PALSAR-2 data; and blue, green, red, near infrared, and shortwave infrared bands, as well as NDVI, NBR, NBR2, NDMI, and SAVI from the Landsat 8 data.…”

Improving living biomass C-stock loss estimates by combining optical satellite, airborne laser scanning, and NFI data

“…Models were in both cases fit using field data located outside the study areas. Landsat, space-borne lidar (GLAS), various map products, and a small number of sample plots were used to map and estimate the total tree biomass in Kenya (Rodríguez-Veiga et al 2020).…”