2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9163349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Spheres as CO2 Sorbents

Abstract: Microporous nanocarbon spheres were prepared by using a microwave assisted solvothermal method. To improve the carbon dioxide adsorption properties, potassium oxalate monohydrate and ethylene diamine (EDA) were employed, and the influence of carbonization temperature on adsorption properties was investigated. For nanocarbon spheres containing not only activator, but also EDA, an increase in the carbonization temperature from 600 °C to 800 °C resulted in an increase of the specific surface area of nearly 300% (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, porous nanocarbons with a high surface area (1114 m 2 /g) in the presence of potassium oxalate and ethylenediamine provided a CO 2 uptake as 4.60 mmol/g at a similar temperature and pressure [30]. Porous nanocarbons with a small surface area (439 m 2 /g) provided a low CO 2 uptake (1.94 mmol/g [30]. Ionic liquids in a silica matrix led to materials having a very small surface area (1-9 m 2 /g) and relatively poor sorption capacity towards CO 2 as 0.35 g of CO 2 per g of adsorbent [27].…”
Section: N2 Adsorption-desorption Of Schiff Bases 1-4mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, porous nanocarbons with a high surface area (1114 m 2 /g) in the presence of potassium oxalate and ethylenediamine provided a CO 2 uptake as 4.60 mmol/g at a similar temperature and pressure [30]. Porous nanocarbons with a small surface area (439 m 2 /g) provided a low CO 2 uptake (1.94 mmol/g [30]. Ionic liquids in a silica matrix led to materials having a very small surface area (1-9 m 2 /g) and relatively poor sorption capacity towards CO 2 as 0.35 g of CO 2 per g of adsorbent [27].…”
Section: N2 Adsorption-desorption Of Schiff Bases 1-4mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Polyacrylonitrile carbon fibers in the presence of a base provided a CO 2 uptake of 2.74 mmol/g at room temperature and normal pressure [31]. In contrast, porous nanocarbons with a high surface area (1114 m 2 /g) in the presence of potassium oxalate and ethylenediamine provided a CO 2 uptake as 4.60 mmol/g at a similar temperature and pressure [30]. Porous nanocarbons with a small surface area (439 m 2 /g) provided a low CO 2 uptake (1.94 mmol/g [30].…”
Section: N2 Adsorption-desorption Of Schiff Bases 1-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, POPs containing heteroatoms (O, N, S, or P) can capture CO2 selectively over nitrogen and methane [50,[54][55][56]. The CO2 uptake using carbon-containing materials such as porous nanocarbons in the presence of additives (e.g., ethylenediamine and potassium oxalate) as media for CO2 adsorption was 1.9-4.6 mmol/g at 25 °C [27]. While carbon fibers containing polyacrylonitrile in the presence of potassium hydroxide led to a CO2 uptake of 2.7 mmol/g at 25 °C and 1 atm [28].…”
Section: Porosity Measurements and Gas Storage Capacity Of 1-3mentioning
confidence: 99%