Carbon Shell on Active Nanocatalyst for Stable Electrocatalysis

Abstract

Conspectus Electrocatalysis is a key process for renewable energy conversion and fuel production in future energy systems. Various nanostructures have been investigated to optimize the electrocatalytic activity and realize efficient energy use. However, the long-term stability of electrocatalysts is also crucial for the sustainable and reliable operation of energy devices. Nanocatalysts are degraded by various processes during electrocatalysis, which causes critical performance loss. Recent operando analyses have revealed the mechanisms of electrocatalyst failure, and specific structures have been identified as robust against degradation. Nevertheless, achieving both high activity and robust stability with the same nanostructure is challenging because the structure–property relationships that affect activity and stability are different. The optimization of electrocatalysis is often limited by a large trade-off between activity and stability in catalyst structures. Therefore, it is essential to introduce functional structural units into catalyst design to achieve electrochemical stability while preserving high activity. In this Account, we highlight the strategic use of carbon shells on catalyst surfaces to improve the stability during electrocatalysis. For this purpose, we cover three issues in the use of carbon-shell-encapsulated nanoparticles (CSENPs) as robust and active electrocatalysts: the origin of the improved stability, the identification of active sites, and synthetic routes. Carbon shells can shield catalyst surfaces from both (electro)­chemical oxidation and physical agglomeration. By limiting the exposure of the catalyst surface to an oxidizing (electro)­chemical environment, carbon shells can preserve the initial active site structure during electrocatalysis. In addition, by providing a physical barrier between nanoparticles, carbon shells can maintain the high surface area of CSENPs by reducing particle agglomeration during electrocatalysis. This barrier effect is also useful for constructing more active or durable structures by annealing without surface area loss. Compared to the clear stabilizing effect, however, the effect of the shell on active sites on the CSENP surface can be puzzling. Even when they are covered by a carbon shell that can block molecular adsorption on active sites, CSENP catalysts remain active and even exhibit unique catalytic behavior. Thus, we briefly cover recent efforts to identify major active sites on CSENPs using molecular probes. Furthermore, considering the membranelike role of the carbon shell, we suggest several remaining issues that should be resolved to obtain a fundamental understanding of CSENP design. Finally, we describe two synthetic approaches for the successful carbon shell encapsulation of nanoparticles: two-step and one-step syntheses. Both the postmortem coating of nanocatalysts (two-step) and the in situ formation via precursor ligands (one step) are shown to produce a durable carbon layer on nanocatalysts in a controlled manner. The strengths and lim...

Advances in Nanofibrous Materials for Stable Lithium-Metal Anodes

“…As well-known, zero-dimensional nanoparticles have a large surface area and high surface energy, so they are easily agglomerated to form aggregates with larger particle size and lose their due effect. 14 In addition, the preparation of two-dimensional nanomaterials has problems such as slow speed, low yield, and poor controllability, and it is difficult to synthesize large-area regular two-dimensional nanomaterials by traditional bottom-up method. 15 In contrast, nanofibrous materials with high aspect ratios have shown great potential in the field of LMA protection due to their special advantages (Figure 2).…”

“…), and three-dimensional nanostructured nanomaterials. As well-known, zero-dimensional nanoparticles have a large surface area and high surface energy, so they are easily agglomerated to form aggregates with larger particle size and lose their due effect . In addition, the preparation of two-dimensional nanomaterials has problems such as slow speed, low yield, and poor controllability, and it is difficult to synthesize large-area regular two-dimensional nanomaterials by traditional bottom-up method .…”

Unexpected High‐Performance Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution in Co@NCNT@ZnIn2S4 Triggered by Directional Charge Separation and Transfer

“…[ 10 ] Nevertheless, the direct exposure of transition metal nanoparticles under ambient conditions is detrimental to the stability of photocatalysts due to their susceptibility to chemical oxidation. [ 11 ] Carbon materials coated on the transition metals can act as physical barriers to protect the inner metals from oxidation and inactivation. [ 12 ] Moreover, the strong interaction between these two components could influence the charge distribution and modulate the local electronic structure, which further optimizes the behavior of photogenerated carriers and the adsorption of the key intermediates.…”

Ultrahigh Metal Content Carbon-Based Catalyst for Efficient Hydrogenation of Furfural: The Regulatory Effect of Glycerol

“…Usually, carbon-based catalysts with high metal loadings are less thermally stable and more likely to agglomerate into largesize MNPs during calcination, which means that size control of highly loaded MNPs is more difficult. The carbon coating method can inhibit catalyst sintering and agglomeration, 21 which not only achieves size control but also improves the stability of catalysts. However, the surface energy of small-sized MNPs is large during calcination, which is more obvious for carbon-based metal catalysts with high loadings.…”