2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon sequestration with land-use cover change in a Himalayan watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the land uses, total mean C stocks range from 28.62 ± 13 t ha -1 in AL to 477.82 ± 39.5 t ha -1 in PCDF. The differences of C stocks in different land uses are consistent with Sharma and Rai (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across the land uses, total mean C stocks range from 28.62 ± 13 t ha -1 in AL to 477.82 ± 39.5 t ha -1 in PCDF. The differences of C stocks in different land uses are consistent with Sharma and Rai (2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Zang et al (2012) pointed out that soil disturbance due to site preparation and tree planting reduces soil carbon. Sharma and Rai (2007) reported that soil carbon loss is greater (92 %) in cropped areas as compared to forests due to disturbances. The grass land conversion to cropland decreases carbon content in soil (Yan et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic carbon is the most important part of the terrestrial carbon pool and plays a crucial role in the global carbon cycle (Tang et al 2006;Zhang et al 2008), containing about twice as much carbon as the atmospheric CO 2 reservoir (Percival et al 2000). It is essential, therefore, to better understand the dynamics of soil carbon (Post and Kwon 2000;Sharma and Rai 2007), and its contribution to carbon storage in systems such as shrub communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest conversion to other uses releases C to the atmosphere and influence the provision of services underlying carbon sequestration (Feddema et al, 2005;Metzger et al, 2006;Schulp et al, 2008) since different ecosystems differ in potential rates of carbon sequestration. For instance, the conversion from forests to croplands or vice versa has a strong bearing on carbon budgets (Silver et al, 2000;Niu and Duiker, 2006;Sharma and Rai, 2007;Don et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%