2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon sequestration in wetlands, from science to practice: An overview of the biogeochemical process, measurement methods, and policy framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alpine wetlands, deep freshwater marshes, and shallow freshwater marshes had higher soil carbon stocks than saline wetlands and permanent open freshwater wetlands. While permanent open freshwater wetlands can be sinks for catchment carbon, a recent study by Villa and Bernal () suggests a quadratic relationship between inundation time and organic carbon stock and sequestration rates. This could also be because permanent open freshwater wetlands tend to have less macrophytes or tress compared to marshes or swamps, and therefore less primary productivity and addition of carbon from within the wetland itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alpine wetlands, deep freshwater marshes, and shallow freshwater marshes had higher soil carbon stocks than saline wetlands and permanent open freshwater wetlands. While permanent open freshwater wetlands can be sinks for catchment carbon, a recent study by Villa and Bernal () suggests a quadratic relationship between inundation time and organic carbon stock and sequestration rates. This could also be because permanent open freshwater wetlands tend to have less macrophytes or tress compared to marshes or swamps, and therefore less primary productivity and addition of carbon from within the wetland itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of magnitude of variation of SOC content, density and storage potential, all the three vegetation communities of the natural section of the wetland had values significantly greater than what was recorded in the converted section. Our reasoning for this observation relates to differences of three aspects: 1) primary productivity [36,39], 2) organic matter recalcitrance [34,40], and 3) flooding regimes [8,32], between the natural and converted sections of the wetland. Plant biomass is the main source of SOM and the subsequent SOC in wetlands [3,15].…”
Section: Soil Organic Carbon In the Natural And Converted Sections Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a small change in SOC pool may have a significant impact on climate change. The high productivity of natural wetlands together with the hypoxic/anoxic conditions enables them to accumulate large amounts of organic carbon in their soils [3,[6][7][8]. For example, wetlands are estimated to contain 20-30% of the earth's soil carbon pool, despite covering only 5-8% of the earth's surface [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetlands and Climate Change: Wetlands are among the most important natural resources on earth that provide a potential sink for atmospheric carbon but-if not managed properly, they become a source of greenhouse gases (Adhikari et al, 2009). Wetlands are an important carbon sink, contributing for climate regulation (Villa and Bernal, 2018). Wetland systems worldwide have been influenced by anthropogenic change (Shand et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%