2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon reduction potential of China's coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source-sink matching model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a model was not assigned an original name in the published literature, its name can be determined by combining the associated source-sink matching approach, network characteristics, or the author's name with the addition of the study area. Thus, 16 models were renamed as follows: M1_SimCCS [18]; M2_CCSPD [19,20]; M3_SimCCS_TIME [21]; M4_InfraCCS_EUR [22]; M5_ChinaCCS_DSS [23,24]; M6_PNS [25]; M7_SCN_US [12,13]; M8_MARKAL_ IND [26]; M9_MILP_EUR (d'Amore et al, [9,10]); M10_MINLP_KOR [27]; M11_MILP_ESP [28]; M12_ ITEAM_CHN [14,29]; M13_SSM_WANG_CHN [30]; M14_SSM_FAN_CHN [11,15]; M15_C3IAM/GCOP (Wei et al, [17]); and M16_ChinaCCUS_DSS_2.0 [16] (Please refer to Supplementary Table 1 and following List of Abbreviations for the detailed information of the 16 types of CCUS source-sink matching models).…”
Section: Model Selection and Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When a model was not assigned an original name in the published literature, its name can be determined by combining the associated source-sink matching approach, network characteristics, or the author's name with the addition of the study area. Thus, 16 models were renamed as follows: M1_SimCCS [18]; M2_CCSPD [19,20]; M3_SimCCS_TIME [21]; M4_InfraCCS_EUR [22]; M5_ChinaCCS_DSS [23,24]; M6_PNS [25]; M7_SCN_US [12,13]; M8_MARKAL_ IND [26]; M9_MILP_EUR (d'Amore et al, [9,10]); M10_MINLP_KOR [27]; M11_MILP_ESP [28]; M12_ ITEAM_CHN [14,29]; M13_SSM_WANG_CHN [30]; M14_SSM_FAN_CHN [11,15]; M15_C3IAM/GCOP (Wei et al, [17]); and M16_ChinaCCUS_DSS_2.0 [16] (Please refer to Supplementary Table 1 and following List of Abbreviations for the detailed information of the 16 types of CCUS source-sink matching models).…”
Section: Model Selection and Evaluation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M15_C3IAM/GCOP model [14] collected 4220 industry-wide carbon clusters and 794 sinks from 85 countries and regions and was committed to the global 92 Gt emission reduction goal contributed by CCUS. The M14_SSM_FAN_CHN model [11,15] developed an optimization model that does not consider cost constraints to explore the emission reduction potential of 607 existing coal-fired power plants in China, using a total of 3853 high-resolution grids for saline aquifers and oil fields as the carbon sinks. The marine geological survey database has rarely been fully utilized to identify potential carbon sinks, although some exploration has been conducted by the M9_MILP_EUR [9,10] and M10_MINLP_KOR [27] models.…”
Section: Carbon Sources and Carbon Sinksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fan et al. developed a CCUS source‐sink matching model by considering the constraints of CO 2 emissions, CO 2 storage potential, injection capacity of various storage sites, and transport distance in China, and the optimization model was applied to determine the CO 2 reduction potential of existing coal‐fired power plants with CCUS in China 21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%