Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations

Abstract

Carbon pricing is a recurrent theme in debates on climate policy. Discarded at the 2009 COP in Copenhagen, it remained part of deliberations for a climate agreement in subsequent years. As there is still much misunderstanding about the many reasons to implement a global carbon price, ideological resistance against it prospers. Here, we present the main arguments for carbon pricing, to stimulate a fair and well‐informed discussion about it. These include considerations that have received little attention so far. We stress that a main reason to use carbon pricing is environmental effectiveness at a relatively low cost, which in turn contributes to enhance social and political acceptability of climate policy. This includes the property that corrected prices stimulate rapid environmental innovations. These arguments are underappreciated in the public debate, where pricing is frequently downplayed and the erroneous view that innovation policies are sufficient is widespread. Carbon pricing and technology policies are, though, largely complementary and thus are both needed for effective climate policy. We also comment on the complementarity of other instruments to carbon pricing. We further discuss distributional consequences of carbon pricing and present suggestions on how to address these. Other political economy issues that receive attention are lobbying, co‐benefits, international policy coordination, motivational crowding in/out, and long‐term commitment. The overview ends with reflections on implementing a global carbon price, whether through a carbon tax or emissions trading. The discussion goes beyond traditional arguments from environmental economics by including relevant insights from energy research and innovation studies as well. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e462. doi: 10.1002/wcc.462 This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Economics of Mitigation

The Impact of the Eu Emissions Trading System on Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage: The Econometric Evidence

“…Whether implemented through emissions trading or carbon taxation, the prime rationale for carbon pricing is its cost effectiveness in reducing emissions (Baumol and Oates, 1971;Baranzini et al, 2017). In a cap-and-trade system, such as the EU ETS, carbon prices are determined by the interplay between supply and demand of emission allowances.…”

Diverse Effects of Consumer Credit on Household Carbon Emissions at Quantiles: Evidence from Urban China

“…Carbon pricing, as the consensus among economists, is thought to be the best tool to tackle the climate externality [49][50][51]. The use of carbon pricing to reduce HCEs in consumer finance goes through four steps.…”

An agent-based model of climate-energy policies to promote wind propulsion technology in shipping

“…Several policies to overcome such barriers exist: (i) carbon pricing (Buhaug et al, 2009;IMO, 2010;Nelissen et al, 2016;Baranzini et al, 2017), (ii) demonstration projects for innovative technologies, either operated, funded, or supported through public institutions such as the IMO which disseminates performance data from full-scale trials to raise expectations and knowledge of alternative technologies (Rojon and Dieperink, 2014;Nelissen et al, 2016;Rehmatulla et al, 2017b), (iii) access to capital through public funding (Nelissen et al, 2016), and (iv) speed limit introduction Mander, 2017). The effectiveness of such policies varies; some policies could result in negative distributional impacts and harm international trade (IMO, 2010;Vivid Economics, 2010).…”