2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon policy risk and corporate capital structure decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors also asserted that it is appropriate to apply the pecking order theory to small and medium-sized companies in India because it is difficult for small and medium-sized companies to access loans in the context of information asymmetry in the financial markets are still high. In another study, Shu et al 5 studied Chinese listed companies from 1997 to 2018 and confirmed that carbon policy risks reduce the financial leverage of companies. This negative relationship is more evident in non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with low ownership ratio of institutional investors, enterprises with poor social responsibility performance and enterprises in the competitive or carbon-sensitive industry group, and businesses in provincial cities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The authors also asserted that it is appropriate to apply the pecking order theory to small and medium-sized companies in India because it is difficult for small and medium-sized companies to access loans in the context of information asymmetry in the financial markets are still high. In another study, Shu et al 5 studied Chinese listed companies from 1997 to 2018 and confirmed that carbon policy risks reduce the financial leverage of companies. This negative relationship is more evident in non-state-owned enterprises, enterprises with low ownership ratio of institutional investors, enterprises with poor social responsibility performance and enterprises in the competitive or carbon-sensitive industry group, and businesses in provincial cities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(2022) and Shu et al. (Shu et al., 2023)). Finally, Xu and Kim (2021) show that financially constrained firms trade abatement costs against potential liabilities, suggesting that financial sector withdrawal could exacerbate vulnerabilities to transition risks.…”
Section: Transition Risks From Non‐financial Agents’ Physical and Res...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ivanov et al (2020) show that transition-exposed firms are more financially constrained. Kacperczyk and Peydro (2021) demonstrate that banks committed to decarbonization cut lending to brown firms, with no effect on their environmental performances and with possible perverse effects in furthering greenwashing (see also Degryse et al (2022) and Shu et al (Shu et al, 2023)). Finally, Xu and Kim (2021) show that financially constrained firms trade abatement costs against potential liabilities, suggesting that financial sector withdrawal could exacerbate vulnerabilities to transition risks.…”
Section: Adaptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(2022) concluded that carbon trading policy would increase the corporate risk-taking level of firms involved. Shu et al (2023) found that carbon policy risk reduces the financial leverage of A-share listed firms in China through three mechanisms: financial constraints, bankruptcy risk, and government power. Our study is different in that focusing on the energy-intensive industries and the carbon trading policy, we present innovative and rigorous theoretical mechanisms: the debt funding mechanism and the demand mechanism for equity issues.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 99%