2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10753-010-9182-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Nanotubes Elicit DNA Damage and Inflammatory Response Relative to Their Size and Shape

Abstract: Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been one of the most extensively researched and developed nanomaterials. However, little concern has been placed on their safety. The biological effects of CNTs are believed to differ relative to size and shape. Thus, the relationship between the characteristics of CNTs and their safety needs to be evaluated. In this study, we examined the biological effects of different-sized multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) and single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs). Long and thick MWCNTs induced the strongest DN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
80
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A single recommended exposure level was proposed (7 µg m −3 ); however, it is recognized that the diverse properties of these materials may impart a range of toxicities. As an example, in a recent comparison of inflammatory responses to different types of CNTs administered to the peritoneum of mice, long thick MWCNTs caused DNA damage and severe inflammatory effects, while similar SWCNTs caused little effect, and short thin MWCNTs had no effect (Yamashita et al, 2010). These findings suggest important differences in the biological responses of CNFs/ CNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single recommended exposure level was proposed (7 µg m −3 ); however, it is recognized that the diverse properties of these materials may impart a range of toxicities. As an example, in a recent comparison of inflammatory responses to different types of CNTs administered to the peritoneum of mice, long thick MWCNTs caused DNA damage and severe inflammatory effects, while similar SWCNTs caused little effect, and short thin MWCNTs had no effect (Yamashita et al, 2010). These findings suggest important differences in the biological responses of CNFs/ CNTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] In addition, long and thick CNTs generate significant DNA damage and potent inflammation, which can increase cancer risk and promote tumor progression. [22] To modulate their biological activity, CNTs have been modified with various polymers using covalent or noncovalent bonding depending on their specific purpose, e.g., modifying the CNTs using poly(ethyleneimine) for carrying DNA, [23] formulation of water dispersible CNTs using pyrene-end-capped or cholesterol-end-capped poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) and cholesterol-end-capped poly(2-dimethylamino ethyl methacrylate), [24] and enhancing cell adherence of the CNTs by applying poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene). [25] In this study, water dispersible and biocompatible SWNTs (SWNT- CP-PDM) were obtained by the combination of a purification step and the application of wrapping materials (PDM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published data in the recent literature point to an increase of various biological responses, such as inflammatory or immune responses, after exposure to nanomaterials. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] These biological responses have been observed and reported on from either in vitro (cell culture-based) or in vivo (whole-animal) model systems; however, more research should be conducted on relating the physicochemical features of each engineered nanomaterial to the observed biological responses. It is critical to develop computational models that not only establish quantitative relationships between different types of experimental data but can also reliably predict biological responses and/or hazards to nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%