2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-2620-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon nanostructure morphology templates nanocomposites for phosphoproteomics

Abstract: Nanocomposites are prepared from different carbon nanostructure scaffolds for magnetite and titania nanoparticle nucleation and growth. Their performance surpasses the commercial reference in NanoHPLC-MS/MS analysis of cancer cell lysates for phosphopeptide enrichment and detection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(51 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is in agreement with Feng et al [ 46 ] who also reported that the addition of graphene sheets changes the ZnO morphology from micrometre rods to nanoparticles. In fact, the oxygenated groups present on the GO surface increase the nucleation sites to anchor the Zn 2+ ions by chemical coordination, as already observed in other studies with ZnO [ 47 ] but also in other metal oxides such as TiO 2 [ 48 ]. Consequently, the availability of Zn 2+ ions to the ZnO particle growth is decreased, which enables to a reduction of their size [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This observation is in agreement with Feng et al [ 46 ] who also reported that the addition of graphene sheets changes the ZnO morphology from micrometre rods to nanoparticles. In fact, the oxygenated groups present on the GO surface increase the nucleation sites to anchor the Zn 2+ ions by chemical coordination, as already observed in other studies with ZnO [ 47 ] but also in other metal oxides such as TiO 2 [ 48 ]. Consequently, the availability of Zn 2+ ions to the ZnO particle growth is decreased, which enables to a reduction of their size [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…All these carbon nanomaterials display specific morphology, size, and reactivity; thus the resulting physico-chemical properties vary greatly from one another. Despite the vast literature on the topic, it is not always straightforward to anticipate which is the most suited for a specific application, especially in the complex context of biologically-relevant samples [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], or when interacting with biomolecules [ 46 ]. Nevertheless, it is possible to state that they all generally feature good electronic conductivity, low density, high mechanical strength, and the ability to be chemically functionalized to tailor their properties as required for the intended use [ 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these diverse carbon nanostructures have been widely studied, yet it is not straightforward to predict which is the ideal candidate based on the type of intended application. This challenge is amplified in biologically relevant contexts, which are characterized by a high-level of chemical complexity [ 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. To this end, it is key to study their different ability to interact with biomolecules and develop a protein corona on their surface [ 68 ] that will influence their ability to elicit an immune response [ 69 , 70 ], as well as their biodegradation [ 71 , 72 ] and biodistribution [ 73 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%