2009
DOI: 10.1021/ie900091n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Molecular Sieves Prepared from Polymeric Precursors: Porous Structure and Hydrogen Adsorption Properties

Abstract: The textural characterization of a series of carbon molecular sieves (CMS) prepared from different polymer precursors has been investigated using N2 adsorption at 77 K and CO2 adsorption at 273 K, together with immersion calorimetry into liquids of different molecular dimensions. Experimental results show that the carbon molecular sieves cover a wide range of porosity, from pure microporous CMS (pore diameter below 0.56 nm) to CMS combining larger micropores (above 0.7 nm) together with a certain proportion of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, narrow micropores (pores below 0.7 nm) are responsible for the adsorption of a small molecule such as CO 2 (kinetic diameter 0.33 nm) under these experimental conditions. Similar correlations with the volume of narrow micropores has been described in the literature for the adsorption of a similar molecule (in a dimension basis) such as hydrogen (kinetic diameter 0.29 nm) into commercial carbon molecular sieves (Silvestre-Albero et al 2009). The crucial role of the narrow microporosity in the adsorption of CO 2 at atmospheric pressure can explain the excel- Correlation between the amount of CO 2 adsorbed at atmospheric pressure and 273 K for the different activated carbon monoliths, and the different textural parameters (S BET , V 0 (N 2 ) and V n (CO 2 )) lent results recently described by Wahby and co-workers for CO 2 adsorption, with total amount adsorbed on highsurface area carbon molecular sieves (V n above 1.40 cm 3 /g) of ∼380 mg CO 2 /g, this value being even larger than those reported in the literature for traditional adsorbents such as zeolites and MOF materials (Bae et al 2008(Bae et al , 2009Himeno et al 2005;Inagaki 2009, Kapoor andYang 1989;Wahby et al 2010;Yazaydin et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Apparently, narrow micropores (pores below 0.7 nm) are responsible for the adsorption of a small molecule such as CO 2 (kinetic diameter 0.33 nm) under these experimental conditions. Similar correlations with the volume of narrow micropores has been described in the literature for the adsorption of a similar molecule (in a dimension basis) such as hydrogen (kinetic diameter 0.29 nm) into commercial carbon molecular sieves (Silvestre-Albero et al 2009). The crucial role of the narrow microporosity in the adsorption of CO 2 at atmospheric pressure can explain the excel- Correlation between the amount of CO 2 adsorbed at atmospheric pressure and 273 K for the different activated carbon monoliths, and the different textural parameters (S BET , V 0 (N 2 ) and V n (CO 2 )) lent results recently described by Wahby and co-workers for CO 2 adsorption, with total amount adsorbed on highsurface area carbon molecular sieves (V n above 1.40 cm 3 /g) of ∼380 mg CO 2 /g, this value being even larger than those reported in the literature for traditional adsorbents such as zeolites and MOF materials (Bae et al 2008(Bae et al , 2009Himeno et al 2005;Inagaki 2009, Kapoor andYang 1989;Wahby et al 2010;Yazaydin et al 2009).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We obtained S BET = 1750 AE 50 m 2 /g. Previous published results for Carboxen-1012 provide a specific surface area included between 1375 m 2 /g [22] and 2000 m 2 /g [23] in agreement with our measurement.…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution Of a Microporous Adsorbentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The selected CMS cover different pore size distributions, and all of them are commercially available from Supelco. Preparation conditions and particle size distribution, for some CMS, were detailed elsewhere [32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%