2003
DOI: 10.1149/1.1602454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Metal Fluoride Nanocomposites

Abstract: The structure and electrochemistry of FeF 3 :C-based carbon metal fluoride nanocomposites ͑CMFNCs͒ was investigated in detail from 4.5 to 1.5 V, revealing a reversible metal fluoride conversion process. These are the first reported examples of a high-capacity reversible conversion process for positive electrodes. A reversible specific capacity of approximately 600 mAh/g of CMFNCs was realized at 70°C. Approximately one-third of the capacity evolved in a reaction between 3.5 and 2.8 V related to the cathodic re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

20
373
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
20
373
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A new positive electrode material with large capacity is needed for these devices, because current positive electrode materials utilize insertion reactions with intrinsically limited capacities based on one-(or less) electron reaction per formula unit (140 mAh g −1 for LiCoO 2 (0.5 Li) [4,5] and 170 mAh g −1 for LiFePO 4 (1 Li) [6]). Thus, instead of such insertion materials, iron(III) fluoride (FeF 3 ) has been receiving attention as a positive electrode material with a high theoretical capacity of 712 mAh g −1 based on the three-electron reaction, reasonably high average operating potential of 2.7 V vs. Li + /Li, in addition to abundant resources of iron [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new positive electrode material with large capacity is needed for these devices, because current positive electrode materials utilize insertion reactions with intrinsically limited capacities based on one-(or less) electron reaction per formula unit (140 mAh g −1 for LiCoO 2 (0.5 Li) [4,5] and 170 mAh g −1 for LiFePO 4 (1 Li) [6]). Thus, instead of such insertion materials, iron(III) fluoride (FeF 3 ) has been receiving attention as a positive electrode material with a high theoretical capacity of 712 mAh g −1 based on the three-electron reaction, reasonably high average operating potential of 2.7 V vs. Li + /Li, in addition to abundant resources of iron [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This insulating problem was improved by ball-milling with carbon materials and, in some reports, high reversible capacities of ca. 600 mAh g −1 were attained according to the two consecutive reactions [8,9]; FeF 3 + Li + + e − ⇄ LiFeF 3 (1)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Such attributes could potentially lead to FeF2 cathodes displaying considerably higher energy densities compared to their 10 intercalation analogues. The potentially high energy density may, however, be somewhat restrained as FeF2 exhibits known Mottinsulator properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] It is generally attributable to the volumetric variations of the active material upon cycling (lithium input and output), leading to a partial loss of contact with the conductive additive, creating isolated particles of active materials which cannot contribute to the electrochemical reactions. Similar considerations can be made for FIBs.…”
Section: Electrochemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%