2003
DOI: 10.1038/nature01737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon loss by deciduous trees in a CO2-rich ancient polar environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spicer and Chapman, 1990). Recent modelling experiments Royer et al, 2003;Osborne et al, 2004) on bliving fossilsQ show that such conclusions can be refuted since the carbon cost of annually shedding leaves in deciduous trees greatly exceeds the cost of respiration in an evergreen canopy. Therefore attention needs to be paid to the morphology and anatomy (e.g.…”
Section: Implications For Growth In the High Southern Latitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spicer and Chapman, 1990). Recent modelling experiments Royer et al, 2003;Osborne et al, 2004) on bliving fossilsQ show that such conclusions can be refuted since the carbon cost of annually shedding leaves in deciduous trees greatly exceeds the cost of respiration in an evergreen canopy. Therefore attention needs to be paid to the morphology and anatomy (e.g.…”
Section: Implications For Growth In the High Southern Latitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-standing evidence for a warm Arctic climate was first indicated by the Eocene fauna on Ellesmere Island (Nunavut, Arctic Canada) that included alligators, a varanid lizard, boid snakes, giant tortoises, tapirs and primates [10][11][12][13][14]. The physiological stresses placed on plants growing in warm polar latitudes are unique-these plants, even in greenhouse conditions of the past, tolerated the same extreme photoperiod that exists currently above the Arctic Circle [15] because the fossil-bearing strata in the High Arctic were just a couple of degrees further south than their present-day latitude [16,17]. Many of these polar plants were deciduous [3,4] and dormant during the dark winter months, but physiologically active during the low-intensity 24 h summer light regime [15,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the positive carbon balance experienced by deciduous plants created a competitive edge that allowed such plants to dominate warm ancient polar ecosystems. Growth chamber experiments and numerical models, however, demonstrate that there is no carbon balance advantage for deciduous trees over evergreen trees grown under a simulated polar photoperiod (Osborne & Beerling 2002;Royer et al 2003Royer et al , 2005, because deciduous trees must annually regrow all leaf tissue, and the carbon source for this new growth must be derived from photosynthate fixed during previous growing seasons (Sauter 1967;Essiamah & Eschrich 1985;Barbaroux & Breda 2002;Damesin & LeLarge 2003). Nevertheless, fossil evidence of trees such as Metasequoia, Larix, Alnus and Betula provides support that deciduous trees dominated the Northern Hemisphere polar regions during the Cenozoic (Wolfe 1980;Greenwood & Basinger 1993;Greenwood 1994;Williams et al 2003Williams et al , 2008Ballantyne et al 2010;Csank et al 2011a,b) and the Cretaceous (Spicer & Parrish 1986;Spicer & Chapman 1990), and they are interpreted to have dominated the Southern Hemisphere polar regions during the Permian and Triassic ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%