2018
DOI: 10.3176/earth.2018.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon isotope values in conodont elements from the latest Devonian–Early Carboniferous carbonate platform facies (Timan-Pechora Basin)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, there have been a few attempts to study the trophic position of conodonts using geochemical methods such as carbon isotopes (Zhuravlev and Smoleva 2018;Zhuravlev 2020;Zhuravlev et al 2020) and Ca isotopes (Balter et al 2019), all of which focused on Devonian or Mississippian conodont genera such as Polygnathus, Hindeodus, Icriodus, and Palmatolepis. These studies have concluded that conodonts were likely low-level or first-order consumers, feeding largely on zooplankton, but were unable to meaningfully distinguish trophic differences between different conodont taxa.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there have been a few attempts to study the trophic position of conodonts using geochemical methods such as carbon isotopes (Zhuravlev and Smoleva 2018;Zhuravlev 2020;Zhuravlev et al 2020) and Ca isotopes (Balter et al 2019), all of which focused on Devonian or Mississippian conodont genera such as Polygnathus, Hindeodus, Icriodus, and Palmatolepis. These studies have concluded that conodonts were likely low-level or first-order consumers, feeding largely on zooplankton, but were unable to meaningfully distinguish trophic differences between different conodont taxa.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the δ 13 C org value is ±0.15‰. The δ 13 C org values in conodont elements are considered as a proxy of position in the trophic web and feeding specialization (Zhuravlev & Smoleva 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that the recovery faunas demonstrate extremely wide ranges of δ 13 C org in conodont elements of Icriodus (from −27.9‰ to −23.1‰), Mitrellataxis (from −27.9‰ to −23.6‰), and Jablonnodus (from −28.1‰ to −23.1‰). The high variability of carbon isotope composition in conodont organic matter suggests unstable trophic relations in the postcrisis shallowwater ecosystems, probably due to rapid expansion of survivors into vacant ecospace (see also Sandberg et al 1988, Zhuravlev & Smoleva 2018. Appearance of icriodontids in deep water associations seems to be the result of their post crisis ecological expansion into the niches of eliminated taxa (biofacies telescoping of Sandberg et al 1988, compare Huang et al 2018, or transport of the shallow water conodont elements to deepwater environment by intensive calciturbidite currents in the early Famennian eustatic lowstand.…”
Section: Conodontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparation of samples for isotopic analysis of organic carbon from conodonts followed standard procedures using 10% acetic acid. Good conodont preservation and a moderate Conodont Alteration Index (CAI lower than 3) favor near-primary isotopic composition of organic matter (Zhuravlev and Smoleva, 2018;Zhuravlev, 2020).…”
Section: Isotope Composition Of Organic Carbon Of Conodont Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%