2002
DOI: 10.1029/2001gb001462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon isotope discrimination in forest and pasture ecosystems of the Amazon Basin, Brazil

Abstract: [1] Our objective was to measure the stable carbon isotope composition of leaf tissue and CO 2 released by respiration (d r ), and to use this information as an estimate of changes in ecosystem isotopic discrimination that occur in response to seasonal and interannual changes in environmental conditions, and land-use change (forest-pasture conversion). We made measurements in primary forest and pastures in the Amazon Basin of Brazil. At the Santarém forest site, d r values showed a seasonal cycle varying from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
95
3
9

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
11
95
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Schleser (1992) also found no difference between D of sunlit, upper canopy leaves and stem-wood in Fagus sylvatica. This finding is consistent with the observation of Cernusak et al (2003) that D of phloem sap sugar in stem agreed well with that expected from instantaneous gas exchange measurements on leaves at two-thirds of canopy height in several stands of E. globulus in south-western Australia, and is also consistent with the observations in Amazonian forest by Ometto et al (2002) that average D of CO 2 released from respiration was similar to that of D of the most sun exposed foliage in dominant trees. These studies show no evidence of carbon fractionation during sugar transport from leaves to stems and we agree with Schleser (1992) that such fractionation is unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Schleser (1992) also found no difference between D of sunlit, upper canopy leaves and stem-wood in Fagus sylvatica. This finding is consistent with the observation of Cernusak et al (2003) that D of phloem sap sugar in stem agreed well with that expected from instantaneous gas exchange measurements on leaves at two-thirds of canopy height in several stands of E. globulus in south-western Australia, and is also consistent with the observations in Amazonian forest by Ometto et al (2002) that average D of CO 2 released from respiration was similar to that of D of the most sun exposed foliage in dominant trees. These studies show no evidence of carbon fractionation during sugar transport from leaves to stems and we agree with Schleser (1992) that such fractionation is unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The model has been used extensively to interpret the carbon isotopic content of nocturnal ecosystem respiration and considerable insight about ecosystem carbon cycling is emerging from its use [Lancaster, 1990;Flanagan et al, 1996;Bowling et al, 2002;Ometto et al, 2002;Pataki et al, 2003] [28] The Keeling approach assumes that a forest with some initial background CO 2 mole fraction C b and isotopic composition d b experiences an increase in [CO 2 ] due to nocturnal respiration by all ecosystem components. Conservation of mass requires that any measured mole fraction C m will be composed of a contribution from the initial background CO 2 present (C b ) and the CO 2 added by respiration (C R ),…”
Section: O Of Ecosystem Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leaf therefore is a function of c i /c a ratio, which is sensitive to a variety of factors that influence the balance of stomatal conductance and assimilation rate, for example light and water availability (Pataki et al, 2003b). The carbon isotope ratio of a leaf (δ 13 C leaf ) is a measure that integrates the photosynthetic activity over the period of weeks to months during which the leaf tissue was synthesized (Ometto et al, 2002;Dawson et al, 2002;Ometto et al, 2006). In tropical forests, δ 13 C leaf is strongly correlated with the height of the leaf within the canopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%